Teams

Boardman - Genesis, Salina

2022 KS 18 & Over Adult Indoor League · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesCindy Reed / Kim Disberger vs Julie Trout / Jesica Rothwell3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Pihl vs Allyson Teal6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2022-03-13vs Bergquist - Genesis, TopekaLost 12
L#1 DoublesMegan Salas / Taylor Gallagher vs Kathy Hof / Carol Cramer2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAmy Pihl vs Ali Wilson5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaegan Lee / Kim Disberger vs Cheryl Whelan / Nicole Turner6-3, 6-4
2022-03-06vs KS/Herzog/18&Over3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesMegan Salas / Allyson Salas vs Shelley Schroeder / Michelle Peck4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJean Boardman vs Dana Huffaker0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Pihl / Taylor Gallagher vs Shelly Power / Lynn Gillam4-6, 1-6
2022-02-20vs Thompson, Crestview Country ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaegan Lee / Allyson Salas vs Snizhana Zhdanova / Mary Stinson2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMegan Salas vs Matawee Paksin6-7, 5-4
L#2 DoublesJean Boardman / Bianca Bulnes vs Patricia Thompson / Nallely Romo-Neuray7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-06vs Dinkel - Genesis, Rock RoadWon 21
W#1 DoublesBianca Bulnes / Megan Salas vs Alisa Franco / Lindsay Hartnett6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAllyson Salas vs Briana Nelson0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Pihl / Taylor Gallagher vs Julie Gentile / Debra Ferris6-4, 3-5, 1-0
2022-01-30vs Cowan - Crestview Country ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Reed / Kim Disberger vs Chandra Knowles / Starburst Murphy5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Salas vs Angela Vetter0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJean Boardman / Bianca Bulnes vs Kelsey Baker / Erin Fulghum4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Bianca Bulnes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.20
Allyson Salas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Megan Salas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Amy Pihl
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Cindy Reed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Kim Disberger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jean Boardman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Le Sankey
published
Taylor Gallagher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Salas + Allyson Salas11263% games+8.8% vs expected
Taylor Gallagher + Kim Disberger3351% games+4.0% vs expected
Megan Salas + Bianca Bulnes2346% games−1.6% vs expected
Amy Pihl + Megan Salas5354% games−3.1% vs expected
Cindy Reed + Kim Disberger0527% games−13.1% vs expected
Amy Pihl + Taylor Gallagher224 matchesnot enough data
Megan Salas + Kim Disberger404 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Gallagher + Bianca Bulnes224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bianca Bulnes
59W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Allyson Salas
34W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Megan Salas
55W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Amy Pihl
20W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Cindy Reed
2W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Disberger
32W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
Jean Boardman
13W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Le Sankey
1W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Taylor Gallagher
23W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.