← Teams

VTC-Smith

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Dean Gaylor
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Wes Schalk
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.56
JT Smith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.27
John Wallin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Bob Towne
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Conor Stanton
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
—
Jim Hamlik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Steven Darling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Results7 ties
2020-02-29Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesPurna Gadde / Dean Gaylor vs Don Brown / Ben Hoerster6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesConor Stanton vs Pete Jacobs7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBob Towne / Michael Juddo vs John Windish / Amir Tadjedin6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGeorge Riley / Wes Schalk vs Jonathan Harms / Kevin Hanzlik6-2, 6-0
2020-02-23Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesDean Gaylor / JT Smith vs Adam Oken / Edward Fu6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGary Doyle / Wes Schalk vs Derek Carlson / Page Watts6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesConor Stanton vs Saurabh Chauhan6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSteven Darling / Daniel Gorecki vs Masafumi Inoue / Leo Edmunson7-6, 6-4
2020-02-21Won 3–2
W#1 DoublesDean Gaylor / JT Smith vs Mark Muckerheide / Fransiscus Odaya6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesConor Stanton vs Sandeep Samal6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGary Doyle / Bob Towne vs John Hapke / Kimbal Logan7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesWes Schalk vs Augustin Belindean6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJim Hamlik / Steven Darling vs Rolf Ellingsen / Hayward Reed6-4, 6-3
2020-02-09Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesGary Doyle / JT Smith vs Charlie Adams / Kent Wall6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesConor Stanton vs Thomas Huff6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Juddo / Bob Towne vs Michael Lee / Darren Malinoski6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSteven Darling / Jim Hamlik vs Andrew Schpak / Todd Sheaffer7-6, 6-4
2020-02-02Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesBob Towne / Gary Doyle vs Bob Lehman / Christopher Shaw6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesConor Stanton vs Martin Jeffrey Binns6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGeorge Riley / Wes Schalk vs Anthony Guzzi / Rick Davis6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDean Gaylor vs Warren Olsen6-3, 6-1
2020-01-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBob Towne / John Wallin vs Kevin Jarvis / Tony Kalil6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDean Gaylor vs Arun Vijayakumar6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGeorge Riley / Wes Schalk vs David Bender / Chris Cremer6-2, 6-3
2020-01-04Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJohn Wallin / JT Smith vs David Aman / Tim Fernstrom6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesConor Stanton vs Stephen Marsh6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGary Doyle / Dean Gaylor vs Michael Leake / Michael Sullivan4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Dean Gaylor
88W–63L career
12%88%1%
3.66
4
Wes Schalk
81W–65L career
5%95%0%
3.66
4
JT Smith
83W–90L career
20%80%0%
3.56
3.5
John Wallin
66W–61L career
5%91%4%
3.27
3.5
Bob Towne
17W–28L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Conor Stanton
19W–9L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jim Hamlik
33W–46L career
not enough data
—
3
Steven Darling
63W–87L career
0%99%1%
2.82

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.