Teams

SD 3.5WD Pacific Beach TC (2:3)/ Levine

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WD · SD - Women - 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 SinglesAmy Airom vs Jennifer Alioto Oliver6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2025-05-20vs SD 3.5WD La Jolla TC (3:2)/ BrunoLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristy Carreno / Kaili Ghio vs Jennifer Bucky / Darcy Karpman3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesBetsy Witt / Kaili Ghio vs Sara Fairbank / Ana Eliza Valencia3-6, 0-6
2025-04-08vs SD 3.5WD Mtn View (3:2)/ FigueroaWon 10
W#2 DoublesYuka Ishikawa / Betsy Witt vs Silvia Rodriguez / Maria Salas Kazmi6-4, 6-4
2025-04-01vs SD 3.5WD SDTRC (3:2)/ AdamsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Thomas / Betsy Witt vs Heather Ravenscroft / Lisa Shirley3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kaili Ghio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Victoria Pearce
published
3.31
Kathleen Bouhdary
published
3.29
Yuka Ishikawa
published
3.28
Alejandra Serrano
published 3.5
3.25
ALEXIS MCCANDLESS
published 3.5
3.21
Betsy Witt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Ciara Levine
published 3.5
3.20
3.12
Amy Airom
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
3.07
Jill Ostrom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.06
Margot Hutchison
published
2.97
Christiana Thieler
published 3.5
2.78
Christy Carreno
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ALEXIS MCCANDLESS + Ciara Levine3252% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Bouhdary + Yuka Ishikawa213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kaili Ghio
59W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Victoria Pearce
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kathleen Bouhdary
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Yuka Ishikawa
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Alejandra Serrano
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
ALEXIS MCCANDLESS
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Betsy Witt
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Ciara Levine
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Tracy Melchior Roybal
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3
Amy Airom
55W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Jill Ostrom
27W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Margot Hutchison
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Christiana Thieler
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Christy Carreno
20W–22L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.