Teams

NJ NAVY

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-28vs MC NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoseph Rodriguez / Kenneth Earl vs Chris Driscoll / Colin Wein3-6, 2-6
2024-05-21vs RHCC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesCraig Krastins / Kenneth Earl vs Stephen Komon / Paul Grumann6-4, 7-6
2024-05-14vs LTC-M REDLost 01
L#1 SinglesKenneth Earl vs Alexander Marqusee0-6, 0-6
2024-05-07vs NJ BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesKenneth Earl / Ely Garza vs Scott Manzolillo / Jeff Richker6-3, 6-2
2024-04-30vs MC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKenneth Earl / Ely Garza vs Jerry Mogab / Mark Phillips5-7, 4-6
2024-04-16vs RHCC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrett Moore / Kenneth Earl vs Alec Rossano / Corey Crawford3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Bryce Engen
published 3.5
3.41
Carl Roberts
published 3.5
3.35
Nick Eccles
published
Brett Moore
published 3.5
3.17
Kenneth Earl
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.17
Matt Leoni
published
3.09
Craig Krastins
published 3.5
2.98
Ely Garza
published 3.5
2.71
Dominic Perea
published 3
Norman Schultz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dominic Perea + Craig Krastins1439% games−3.6% vs expected
Carl Roberts + Craig Krastins4156% gamesnot enough data
Kenneth Earl + Matt Leoni134 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Earl + Carl Roberts123 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Earl + Craig Krastins033 matchesnot enough data
Brett Moore + Dominic Perea123 matchesnot enough data
Carl Roberts + Dominic Perea123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bryce Engen
8W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Carl Roberts
62W–39L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.41
Nick Eccles
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Brett Moore
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Kenneth Earl
25W–68L career · 6 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Matt Leoni
60W–34L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Craig Krastins
36W–35L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Ely Garza
12W–22L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Dominic Perea
8W–20L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.71
Norman Schultz
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.