Teams

LCranford (Sardis)

2025 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 6.5 Women - Mon AM

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-06vs JLayne/MDavis (Southampton)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDeborah Spaugh / Holly Foley vs Michelle Davis / Valerie Link4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-22vs NMurphy (WSRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKristen Deskevich / Deborah Spaugh vs Margot Dorsel / Cathy Mcdonald7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHolly Foley / Pat Williams vs Lisa Wilson / Tracy Lacroix2-6, 6-7
2025-09-15vs FHaselden/LHatfield (Palisades)Won 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Foley / Kristen Deskevich vs Shawne Batterbee / Amy MacDonnell6-4, 6-4
2025-09-08vs TBlankenship (PCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDeborah Spaugh / Laura Weisner vs Cassandra Greco / Kristin Heidkamp1-6, 0-6
2025-09-01vs KNovak (Charlotte Tennis NC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Deskevich / Holly Foley vs Jane Bond / Vicki Greenway6-2, 6-2
2025-08-18vs EGold (OPRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDeborah Spaugh / Holly Foley vs Kathy Hammack / Janet Newton3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 6.5 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Holly Foley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.93
Deborah Spaugh
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Laura Flowe
published
2.82
Cathie DeCramer
published 3
2.81
Jane Satterfield
published
2.59
Susan Crosby
published
2.55
Laura Weisner
published
2.46
Wanda Doss
published
2.38
Linda Cranford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Foley + Deborah Spaugh161052% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Holly Foley
77W–79L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Deborah Spaugh
47W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Laura Flowe
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Cathie DeCramer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Jane Satterfield
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Susan Crosby
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Laura Weisner
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Wanda Doss
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Linda Cranford
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.