Teams

BSmith (Carmel CC)

2022 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 4.5 Men - Tues PM

6 players · average NTRP 4.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-06-28vs SHenkel (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 SinglesNeil Handelsman vs Benjamin Pennell6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesDaniel Comisar vs Steve Henkel6-1, 6-2
2022-06-21vs JClarke/AShulz (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesDaniel Comisar vs Russell Williams6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesBrian Mogelefsky vs Kevin Green6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2022-06-07vs SHenkel (Blakeney)Won 10
W#3 SinglesBrian Mogelefsky vs Benjamin Pennell6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 4.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Felipe Bautista
published 4.5
4.34
Neil Handelsman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
David Schweppe
published 4.5
4.28
Daniel Comisar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.25
Brian Mogelefsky
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Dean Lackey
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neil Handelsman + Daniel Comisar6458% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Felipe Bautista
12W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
4.52
4.5
Neil Handelsman
58W–23L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
David Schweppe
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Daniel Comisar
90W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Brian Mogelefsky
61W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Dean Lackey
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.