Teams

TTC-The Heartbreakers

2022 ADULT 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-02-20vs IHC-PetersWon 31
W#1 DoublesRobin Evans / Claudia Hamilton vs Tiffera Tarbox / Kendra Barkes6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Fonyo Boggess vs BARBARA GHIO2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMei Morgan / Margaret Collier vs Connie Peters / Kerry Moyer4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Brandt / Donna Keim vs Alejandra Clemens / Dana Richardson6-4, 6-2
2022-02-20vs TTC-YostWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaudia Hamilton / Robin Evans vs Katherine Gibbs / Staci Schipporeit6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMargaret Collier vs Sherresa Brasfield6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Keim / Carolyn Fonyo Boggess vs Ranee McDougal / Ann Yost7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-19vs ACB-FeldmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaudia Hamilton / Robin Evans vs Elana Fedor / Irene Moore6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiane Brandt / Carolyn Fonyo Boggess vs Becky Hammagren / Christina Godat2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Collier / Mei Morgan vs Ginger Alden / Sherry Rogers6-0, 6-3
2022-02-18vs ESTC-WolfeLost 12
L#1 DoublesClaudia Hamilton / Robin Evans vs Tami Calkin / Brenda Nulty1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Fonyo Boggess / Margaret Collier vs Julie Mohler / Sue Devereux1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Keim / Mei Morgan vs Victoria Gray / Jody Rolnick6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ESTC-Wolfe4010615129
2TTC-Yost228820154
3TTC-The Heartbreakers139718148
4IHC-Peters0441225162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Donna Keim
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Claudia Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Carolyn Fonyo Boggess
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.41
Margaret Collier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Robin Evans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Evans + Claudia Hamilton3345% games+4.6% vs expected
Donna Keim + Carolyn Fonyo Boggess9850% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Hamilton + Donna Keim303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Donna Keim
61W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Claudia Hamilton
35W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Carolyn Fonyo Boggess
10W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Margaret Collier
28W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Robin Evans
11W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.