Teams

Thomas/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.5 Men 18 & over

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-11vs Heard / MemphisWon 50
W#1 DoublesRoss Nazari / Kevin Womack vs Matt Stark / Alan Kirk3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJeremy Huelin vs Chris Garner7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Johnson / William Griffin vs John Stukenborg / Gareth Tasker6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesLee Olswanger vs Eric Gibbs6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHunter Ivy / John Lancaster vs Graham Heard / Christopher Murabito6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-23vs Brackett/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Blen / Kevin Womack vs Peyton Neal / Ryan McFadden7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLee Olswanger vs Bryan Moore5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesWade Hodge / Hunter Ivy vs Cashe Shows / Matthew McCalla4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-02-28vs Day/MemphisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJohn Bartholomew / Vidyasagar Velamala vs Taylor Lackie / Griffin Beard6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Johnson / John Lancaster vs Barrett Day / Dusty Nelson0-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesJeremy Huelin vs Tyler Little7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRoss Nazari / Hunter Ivy vs Ben Avant / Gregory Gaston2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5 Men 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Thomas/Memphis53221841374
2Coopwood/Memphis35202045374
3McKenna/Memphis17122863421
4Heard / Memphis1783264424

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Vidyasagar Velamala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Kevin Womack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Michael Blen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Hunter Ivy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
John Bartholomew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Wade Hodge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Lee Olswanger
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.15
Jeremy Huelin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.08
Austin Boyd
published 3
2.92
John Lancaster
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Ross Nazari
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Larry Dawson
published
Samuel Hardiman
published
William Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Lancaster + Hunter Ivy134 matchesnot enough data
Hunter Ivy + Michael Blen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vidyasagar Velamala
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
Kevin Womack
22W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Michael Blen
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
Hunter Ivy
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
John Bartholomew
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Wade Hodge
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Lee Olswanger
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Jeremy Huelin
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
3
Austin Boyd
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
John Lancaster
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Ross Nazari
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.84
Larry Dawson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Samuel Hardiman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
William Griffin
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.