Teams

V - Pierpont Riptides

2023 USTA Adult 40 &Over - Ventura WD · V - Women 3.5 WD

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesDiane Hendrickson / Lynne Krueger vs Wendy Brown / Darcy Antonellis1-6, 5-7
2023-03-27vs V - Rancho Madera AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiane Covington / Diane Hendrickson vs Patricia Francisco / Vicky Modglin4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-03-23vs V - Las Posas Love BitesLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiane Hendrickson / CANDACE NESSE vs Julie Gisler / Robin Alimena3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Duddy vs Amy Galan4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-03-02vs V - Winter WACettesLost 02
L#1 SinglesMichelle Duddy vs Lisa Marnell5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Covington / Lynne Krueger vs Lindsay Cowen / Kim Spencer6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2023-02-20vs V - Sherwood StarsLost 01
L#3 DoublesDiane Covington / Diane Hendrickson vs Renee Christopher / Christina Privette6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-02-09vs V - Sunset Bad Ace BeachesLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiane Covington / Diane Hendrickson vs Nicole Mitchell / SANDI WISE3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Duddy vs Jean Bridges7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-12vs V - Spanish Hills 40 LoveLost 01
L#2 DoublesDiane Hendrickson / Siri Rochin vs Laura Kiker / Sarah Smith4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Michelle Duddy
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.19
Myla Hanson
published
2.98
Jenny Ebert
published
2.91
Diane Hendrickson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Lynne Krueger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 0
Theresa Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynne Krueger + Diane Hendrickson3646% gamesnot enough data
Diane Hendrickson + Michelle Duddy404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michelle Duddy
101W–71L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
Myla Hanson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Jenny Ebert
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Diane Hendrickson
90W–93L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
2.91
0
Lynne Krueger
37W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Theresa Ryan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.