Teams

Storer Academy

Mixed 40 & Over 2026 · 2026 40 & Over Mixed 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesTomas III Aleman / Maria Flores vs Yvonne Imbert / David Solis6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJose Escribano / Desiree Nieva vs Chantal Corcoran / Chris Corcoran3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNorman David Storer Padro / Melany Ruiz vs Ruth Ramon / Javier Colon Davila6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-01vs VeredasLost 12
L#1 DoublesArnaldo Xavier Rodriguez Droz / Wilmarie Alvarado Orriz vs Sandra Cruz / Humberto Rios Perez5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJose Escribano / Desiree Nieva vs David Vega / Mariel Rivera Fernandez3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNorman David Storer Padro / Marynes Colon vs Carlos Rios / Joyce Zayas6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 40 & Over Mixed 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Maria Flores
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Javier Moreno
published 3.5
3.08
Norman David Storer Padro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Arnaldo Xavier Rodriguez Droz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Wilmarie Alvarado Orriz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.31
Tomas III Aleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Desiree Nieva
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.26
Marynes Colon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jose Escribano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marines Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melany Ruiz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Desiree Nieva + Javier Moreno314 matchesnot enough data
Arnaldo Xavier Rodriguez Droz + Wilmarie Alvarado Orriz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Flores
27W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Javier Moreno
168W–85L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Norman David Storer Padro
26W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Arnaldo Xavier Rodriguez Droz
39W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Wilmarie Alvarado Orriz
39W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Tomas III Aleman
8W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
3
Desiree Nieva
19W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.28
Marynes Colon
21W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
Jose Escribano
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marines Garcia
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melany Ruiz
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.