Teams

Dill/NLR/Reb

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-29vs Mulhollen/LR/RebLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Bryant / Doris Dill vs Robin Dehaven / Jann Pharo0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Thomason / Joyce Stroud vs Cynthia Glover / Linda Cassinelli2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBetty Sullivan / Elizabeth Buchanan vs Alysanne Crymes / Rina Thomas3-6, 2-6
2024-09-28vs Wallman/Bella Vista/KTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoyce Stroud / Susan Coleman vs Phyllis McCulley / Iva Shanahan6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanie Calvert / Elizabeth Buchanan vs Janice Bowen / Norma Hamm5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCarol Slattery / Barbara Thomason vs Linda Wallman / Maggie Johnston7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-09-28vs Mulhollen/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoyce Stroud / Linda Rauls vs Jann Pharo / Robin Dehaven7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBetty Sullivan / Susan Coleman vs Carol Stapleton / Nora Goss7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Buchanan / Janie Calvert vs Cynthia Glover / Linda Cassinelli6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-27vs Wallman/Bella Vista/KTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanie Calvert / Karen Bryant vs Janice Bowen / Norma Hamm2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Coleman / Betty Sullivan vs Maggie Johnston / Linda Wallman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Slattery / Barbara Thomason vs Phyllis McCulley / Iva Shanahan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Joyce Stroud
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Carol Slattery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Susan Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Barbara Thomason
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Betty Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Linda Rauls
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Doris Dill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Buchanan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Janie Calvert
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Rauls + Joyce Stroud224 matchesnot enough data
Janie Calvert + Joyce Stroud134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joyce Stroud
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Carol Slattery
4W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
Susan Coleman
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Barbara Thomason
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Betty Sullivan
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Rauls
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Doris Dill
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Elizabeth Buchanan
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Janie Calvert
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.