Teams

Graham/40/4.0/M/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Adult 40 & Over - Men · 4.0 Shrev

10 players · average NTRP / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-19vs Roemer/40/4.0/M/POTCWon 40
W#1 DoublesJason Doerner / Jeremy Jones vs Ramin Zamani / Scott Wolf6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Jeffries vs Jerry Davis6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEdward Burchett / Patric Dubois vs Thomas O'Brien / Blake Bunnett6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCurt Graham / Jason Curley vs Adam Young / Marcus Briggs1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-16vs Roemer/40/4.0/M/POTCWon 31
W#1 DoublesEdward Burchett / Richard Karam vs Franklin Roemer / Blake Rainey6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Jeffries vs Nitin Walyat6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJason Doerner / Nick Nunn vs Vince Truong / Jerry Davis3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeremy Jones / Jason Curley vs Adam Young / Blake Bunnett2-6, 1-6
2025-03-12vs Roemer/40/4.0/M/POTCWon 31
W#1 DoublesEdward Burchett / Richard Karam vs Jerry Davis / Marcus Briggs6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJohn Jeffries vs Nitin Walyat6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJason Doerner / Jeremy Jones vs Franklin Roemer / Vince Truong3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCurt Graham / Timothy Ellis vs Stephen Craig / Ramin Zamani6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Jared Fry
published
3.86
Jason Doerner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
John Jeffries
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.78
Patric Dubois
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Richard Karam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Jason Curley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Edward Burchett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Nick Nunn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Timothy Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Quinlan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Burchett + Richard Karam404 matchesnot enough data
Richard Karam + Jared Fry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jared Fry
34W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
Jason Doerner
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
John Jeffries
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Patric Dubois
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Richard Karam
36W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Jason Curley
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Edward Burchett
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Nick Nunn
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Timothy Ellis
25W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Kevin Quinlan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.