Teams

Net Queens

2026 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-02vs Bend & Snap!Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPortia Rauer / Melissa Waine-Cunliffe vs Cindy Haroian / Daphne McNeal1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-23vs Vintage VolleysLost 02
L#2 DoublesStefanie Glaspell / Melissa Waine-Cunliffe vs Sheila Hennessey / Kathlyn Johans6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnne Comstock / Portia Rauer vs Lora Bonser / Elizabeth Schneider1-6, 2-6
2026-06-18vs Aces and LacesWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeannie Amader / Melissa Waine-Cunliffe vs Sue Large / Hitomi Saheki7-5, 6-2
2026-06-11vs SwingersWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Waine-Cunliffe / Portia Rauer vs Maria Garatea / Deborah Whipple6-1, 7-5
2026-06-09vs Bend & Snap!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Comstock / Portia Rauer vs Kim Agler / Stacey Novak2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Teresa Giamportone
published 3.5
2.99
Cathy Johnson
published 3
2.92
Jeannie Amader
published 3
Anne Comstock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Tammy Austin
published 3
2.71
Jennifer Jensen
published
2.63
2.43
Stacy West
published 2.5
Melissa Waine-Cunliffe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Portia Rauer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sue Markuson
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Giamportone + Stacy West3350% games+3.0% vs expected
Anne Comstock + Portia Rauer121351% gamesnot enough data
Sue Markuson + Cathy Johnson2448% gamesnot enough data
Cathy Johnson + Jeannie Amader4167% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Jensen + Sue Markuson224 matchesnot enough data
Portia Rauer + Sue Markuson123 matchesnot enough data
Portia Rauer + Melissa Waine-Cunliffe123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Teresa Giamportone
18W–29L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Cathy Johnson
16W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Jeannie Amader
9W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Anne Comstock
31W–33L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Tammy Austin
7W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Jennifer Jensen
25W–44L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Stefanie Glaspell
5W–14L career · type S · no lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
Stacy West
10W–12L career · no lines in 2026
0%70%30%
2.43
Melissa Waine-Cunliffe
25W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Portia Rauer
47W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sue Markuson
91W–75L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.