Teams

OC Palisades - Drew

2026 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Lyn Soma
published
3.36
Kim Kurisu
published
3.32
Cynthia Gore
published 3.5
3.31
Heather Bogard
published
3.25
Reiko Kurakazu
published
3.25
Sue Wolfe
published
3.25
Zinat Torres
published
3.21
Melissa Luu
published
3.19
Lauren Harchut
published
3.17
Samantha Bloom
published
3.16
Lisa Hughes
published
3.15
Ann Matich
published 3.5
3.12
Lori Ratzlaff
published
3.07
Elizabeth Hogan
published
3.06
Hellene Thurston
published
Julie Corrigan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Gore + Elizabeth Hogan4164% games+5.7% vs expected
Elizabeth Hogan + Lyn Soma2356% games+4.0% vs expected
Reiko Kurakazu + Sue Wolfe13359% games+3.9% vs expected
Hellene Thurston + Zinat Torres314 matchesnot enough data
Lyn Soma + Ann Matich314 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Gore + Hellene Thurston213 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Gore + Heather Bogard123 matchesnot enough data
Hellene Thurston + Lisa Hughes033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lyn Soma
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kim Kurisu
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Cynthia Gore
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
Heather Bogard
7W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Reiko Kurakazu
18W–10L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Sue Wolfe
14W–6L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Zinat Torres
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Melissa Luu
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Lauren Harchut
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Samantha Bloom
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Lisa Hughes
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Ann Matich
7W–5L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Lori Ratzlaff
9W–10L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Elizabeth Hogan
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Hellene Thurston
7W–10L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
Julie Corrigan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.