Teams

Dillon - Carreno

2023 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Night · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-08vs Heron Bay - GoetzLost 01
L#3 DoublesKarla Hernandez / Silvia Carreno vs Claudia Garcia / Diana Bastias4-6, 3-6
2023-06-07vs Midtown - MontserratWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatherine Lavin / Elizabeth Lavin vs Sondra Carpio / Yrma Petersen6-1, 6-1
2023-05-17vs Midtown - MontserratWon 10
W#3 DoublesSilvia Carreno / Karla Hernandez vs Yrma Petersen / Maria Escarra4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-10vs Broward/Contreras/A18&Over3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKatherine Lavin / Patricia Vegas vs Camille Aponte / Valerie Hansen0-6, 1-6
2023-05-03vs Jetc - RogersonLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatherine Lavin / Claudia Chez vs Heather Hosseini / Ivonny Brito Levy6-7, 4-6
2023-04-19vs Wrc - LandSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPatricia Vegas / Katherine Lavin vs Valeria Cisneros / Mariela Cordoba4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSilvia Carreno vs France Gaudreau6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-04-05vs Heron Bay - GoetzLost 02
L#2 SinglesSilvia Carreno vs Esther Lem2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Lavin / Tammy Gibson vs Cheri Tishman / Monica Rosenberg0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Tammy Gibson
published
3.41
Gloria Bolgar
published
3.26
Karla Hernandez
published
3.26
Diana Latuff
published 3.5
3.07
Maria Elena Rojas
published
2.96
Katherine Lavin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
Silvia Carreno
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karla Hernandez + Silvia Carreno2447% games+11.8% vs expected
Gloria Bolgar + Tammy Gibson8556% games+5.9% vs expected
Silvia Carreno + Diana Latuff134 matchesnot enough data
Karla Hernandez + Diana Latuff123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Gibson
30W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Gloria Bolgar
25W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
3.41
Karla Hernandez
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Diana Latuff
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Maria Elena Rojas
11W–23L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Katherine Lavin
16W–39L career · 5 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Silvia Carreno
30W–66L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.