Teams

GSCC BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-29vs BASALT REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesSasha Enewold / Amy Roggie vs Ashley Richardson / Leslie Riddel6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMiranda Wagler vs Denise Taylor7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Sale / Stacey Adams vs Monica Cohan / Molly Jones6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJenell Hilderbrand / Siri Olsen vs Marilyn Ortmann / Karen Price6-2, 6-2
2024-07-27vs RVR BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Sale / Stacey Adams vs Jennifer Given / Eileen Waski6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSiri Olsen / Ksana Oglesby vs Sara Gilbertson / Olivia Emery6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKeely Eberly / Miranda Wagler vs Jill Brewer / Dianne Leoni2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-22vs GSCC SILVERSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAmy Roggie / Sasha Enewold vs Brenda Grumley / Heidi Paul6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJenell Hilderbrand vs Meghan Hegberg5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Boyd / Siri Olsen vs Megan Hayes / Erin Zalinski4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesStacey Adams / Shannon Francis-Pienaar vs Amy Thornton / Brady Emens6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-15vs RVR BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmy Roggie / Jenell Hilderbrand vs Eileen Waski / Diane Boat6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSatya Leidner vs Jennifer Hamilton4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSiri Olsen / Stacey Adams vs Susan Blizzard / Olivia Emery4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Howe / Mary Boyd vs Tricia Pionzio / Jill Brewer6-4, 6-1
2024-07-08vs CROWN REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesStacey Adams / Anne Sale vs Crystal McNamee / Kathy Robinson3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMiranda Wagler vs Kimberly Welsh6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJenell Hilderbrand / Ksana Oglesby vs Kelly Capri / Andrea Olson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Roggie / Keely Eberly vs Julie Glen / Vivian Williams6-3, 6-2
2024-06-24vs BASALT REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesJenell Hilderbrand / Siri Olsen vs Ashley Richardson / Leslie Riddel6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMiranda Wagler vs Molly Jones6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Roggie / Sasha Enewold vs Lauren Noble / Tierney White7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesHeather Howe / Shannon Francis-Pienaar vs Corin Brucker / Karen Price4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Stacey Adams
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.62
Miranda Wagler
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Jenell Hilderbrand
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.43
Siri Olsen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.42
Anne Sale
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Mary Boyd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Amy Roggie
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Heather Howe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Keely Eberly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Ksana Oglesby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Sasha Enewold
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Satya Leidner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Shannon Francis-Pienaar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ksana Oglesby + Siri Olsen10561% games+11.6% vs expected
Stacey Adams + Siri Olsen20077% games+8.3% vs expected
Sasha Enewold + Amy Roggie12160% games+6.1% vs expected
Amy Roggie + Mary Boyd9457% games+4.6% vs expected
Jenell Hilderbrand + Siri Olsen12266% games+3.9% vs expected
Anne Sale + Siri Olsen20171% games+3.7% vs expected
Anne Sale + Stacey Adams161058% games+2.7% vs expected
Sasha Enewold + Mary Boyd4154% games+1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Adams
62W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Miranda Wagler
84W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
Jenell Hilderbrand
79W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Siri Olsen
95W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Anne Sale
88W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
Mary Boyd
26W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Amy Roggie
95W–47L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Heather Howe
20W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Keely Eberly
41W–78L career · 2 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Ksana Oglesby
30W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.83
Sasha Enewold
24W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Satya Leidner
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Shannon Francis-Pienaar
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.