Teams

Broward/Goetz/18&OverMxd7.0

2024 Broward Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.54 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-19vs Broward/DelaRosa/18&OverMxd7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesJenny Harrison / Mike Tichacek vs Alberto de la Rosa / Maria Lanza6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMauricio Camacho / Lidia Luz vs Victor Rodriguez / Marianne Rivas7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDominique Jean-Baptiste / Ankur Kapoor vs Daniela Hernandez / CHAGIN BUAIZ7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2024-06-14vs Veltri/ChenWon 20
W#2 DoublesNatalia Frantsevskaya / Egor Frantsevskiy vs Yonghong Chen / Edward Ng6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlexey Rasskazov / Jenny Harrison vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-31vs Wrc/PerillaWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalia Frantsevskaya / Alexey Rasskazov vs Roberto Gentile / ELEONORA TADDEI6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJonathan Goetz / Dominique Jean-Baptiste vs Roberto Palma / Graciela Randazzo7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJenny Harrison / Mike Tichacek vs JOSE F MENDEZ / Maria Avellaneda7-5, 6-1
2024-05-17vs Midtown/Durante/CorreaLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanh Nguyen / Dominique Jean-Baptiste vs Diego Andrade / Ili Montnor4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGina Goetz / Mike Tichacek vs MARIANA DURANTE / Mel Tejada4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMauricio Camacho / Lidia Luz vs Maria Moreno / Alejandro Tamayo7-5, 6-3
2024-05-10vs Wrc/ThackerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNatalia Frantsevskaya / Egor Frantsevskiy vs Udi Ben-David / Itala Ream0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDaniela Romay / Mauricio Camacho vs Adrian Perez / CAROLINA SANABRIA6-3, 7-5
2024-05-03vs Veltri/SassonLost 12
W#1 DoublesMike Tichacek / Gina Goetz vs Gregory Joseph / Gabriela Reyes6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnkur Kapoor / Dominique Jean-Baptiste vs Carlos Muniz / Carolina Rivera4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLidia Luz / Jonathan Goetz vs Haim Sasson / Andrea Barci4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-04-26vs Midtown/BarronWon 20
W#1 DoublesLidia Luz / Ankur Kapoor vs Gerardo Naranjo / Claudia Torres6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEgor Frantsevskiy / Natalia Frantsevskaya vs Juan Vesga / Paloma Seminario4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-19vs Veltri/ChenWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnkur Kapoor / Dominique Jean-Baptiste vs Harry Dong / Peilan Yao7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMauricio Camacho / Daniela Romay vs Paulette Janice Snagg / Ian Snagg6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGina Goetz / Mike Tichacek vs Gricel Boto Bernales / Edward Ng6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Gina Goetz
published 4
3.87
Natalia Frantsevskaya
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
Jenny Harrison
published
3.78
Gabriela Alvarez
published 4
3.60
Lidia Luz
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.53
Dominique Jean-Baptiste
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.48
Ankur Kapoor
published 3.5
3.40
Mauricio Camacho
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Daniela Romay
published 3.5
3.09
Alexey Rasskazov
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.01
Egor Frantsevskiy
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Carlos Miquel
published 3
2.49
Mike Tichacek
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
Jonathan Goetz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Tichacek + Gina Goetz6069% games+22.4% vs expected
Natalia Frantsevskaya + Alexey Rasskazov9554% games−2.8% vs expected
Natalia Frantsevskaya + Egor Frantsevskiy314 matchesnot enough data
Mauricio Camacho + Lidia Luz314 matchesnot enough data
Mauricio Camacho + Daniela Romay404 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Harrison + Egor Frantsevskiy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gina Goetz
30W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Natalia Frantsevskaya
169W–134L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
Jenny Harrison
18W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Gabriela Alvarez
25W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Lidia Luz
104W–75L career · 7 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Dominique Jean-Baptiste
103W–115L career · 11 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Ankur Kapoor
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Mauricio Camacho
156W–115L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Daniela Romay
29W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Alexey Rasskazov
122W–99L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Egor Frantsevskiy
37W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Carlos Miquel
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Mike Tichacek
298W–203L career · 9 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.49
Jonathan Goetz
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.