Teams

TOCC-Mitchell

2024 Mixed 18 & Over-GC · 2.5 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 2.60 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-19vs BBTC Smith/FindleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Bourcy / Shari Newman vs Jared Johnson / Elan Buckley0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHillary Mathis / Mark Mathis vs Mollie Rockstad / Pete Umbdenstock2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Swetman / Andrew Swetman vs Kris Findley / Ann Strange6-0, 6-2
2024-07-10vs BBTC Smith/FindleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatherine Swetman / Andrew Swetman vs Mollie Rockstad / Trevor Rockstad6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShari Newman / Benjamin Bourcy vs Tyler Ash / Kris Findley6-4, 6-3
2024-07-08vs BBTC - KnightLost 03
L#1 DoublesJordan Roussel / Angela Moreton vs Barry Regula / Dana Delvescovo1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatherine Swetman / Andrew Swetman vs Dale Brehm / Pam Berdine0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Bourcy / Shari Newman vs Christopher Smith / Tori Plott6-7, 2-6
2024-07-02vs BBTC Smith/FindleyWon 21
L#1 DoublesStewart Wood / Angela Moreton vs Trevor Rockstad / Mollie Rockstad0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJordan Roussel / Shari Newman vs Pete Umbdenstock / Julie Umbdenstock6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMark Mathis / Hillary Mathis vs Kris Findley / Cheryl Smith7-6, 7-6
2024-06-18vs BBTC - KnightLost 02
L#1 DoublesGeralyn Roussel / Jordan Roussel vs Scott Pridgen / Carrie Fish2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatherine Swetman / Andrew Swetman vs Barry Regula / Pam Berdine3-4
2024-06-11vs BBTC - KnightLost 03
L#1 DoublesJordan Roussel / Geralyn Roussel vs Dana Delvescovo / Martin Coy4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShari Newman / Stewart Wood vs Tori Plott / Christopher Smith0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAndrew Swetman / Katherine Swetman vs Lynn Hebert / Chris Spear4-6, 0-6
2024-05-28vs BBTC - KnightLost 03
L#1 DoublesSolly Chedid / Shari Newman vs Barry Regula / Lynn Hebert3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Bourcy / Katherine Swetman vs Chris Spear / Pam Berdine3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMark Mathis / Hillary Mathis vs Scott Pridgen / Tori Plott2-6, 4-6
2024-05-21vs BBTC Smith/FindleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Swetman / Katherine Swetman vs Jared Johnson / Elan Buckley4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHillary Mathis / Mark Mathis vs Julie Umbdenstock / Pete Umbdenstock3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTara Mitchell / Solly Chedid vs Cheryl Smith / Trevor Rockstad0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTC - Knight712138140
2BBTC Smith/Findley35101428211
3TOCC-Mitchell2651939263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Jordan Roussel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.53
Benjamin Bourcy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.50
Katherine Swetman
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.32
Tara Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Shari Newman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Andrew Swetman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Geralyn Roussel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Hillary Mathis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.00
Solly Chedid
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
1.67
Angela Moreton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Mark Mathis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Stewart Wood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Swetman + Katherine Swetman2439% gamesnot enough data
Hillary Mathis + Mark Mathis2342% gamesnot enough data
Shari Newman + Benjamin Bourcy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jordan Roussel
23W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Benjamin Bourcy
23W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
2.53
Katherine Swetman
34W–33L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%51%49%
2.50
Tara Mitchell
34W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
0%92%8%
2.32
Shari Newman
12W–50L career · 6 lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
2.27
2.5
Andrew Swetman
2W–4L career · type M · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Geralyn Roussel
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Hillary Mathis
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Solly Chedid
6W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Angela Moreton
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.67
Mark Mathis
4W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stewart Wood
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.