Teams

Mitchell

2026 Fall 18 & Over 2.5W - 4.5 · 4.0 Adult 18 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-23vs Claiborne 4.0 18Won 31
W#1 DoublesStephanie James / Molly Mason vs Peggy Claiborne / Shannon Clemmons6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMelody Smith vs Halle McCrory0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDiana McCutcheon / Cynthia Fennel vs Tamela Traglia / Melissa Young6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCaitlin Barker / Sandra Kirk vs Holly Moody / Sabrina Eddins6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-15vs Claiborne 4.0 18Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDevon Hester / Brilee Barksdale vs Lauren Cantrell / Jana Killen6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonna Barksdale / Tonya Shelton vs Peggy Claiborne / Shannon Clemmons4-6, 2-6
2025-11-11vs Claiborne 4.0 18Won 30
W#1 DoublesCynthia Fennel / Stephanie James vs Jana Killen / Krystal Garrison6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDonna Barksdale / Tonya Shelton vs Holly Moody / Shannon Clemmons6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSandra Kirk / Diana McCutcheon vs Abigail Lovelace / Leia Hartley6-2, 6-1
2025-11-06vs Claiborne 4.0 18Split 22
L#1 DoublesClaire Mitchell / Stephanie James vs Tamela Traglia / Melissa Young3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMelody Smith vs Jana Killen3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDevon Hester / Brilee Barksdale vs Sabrina Eddins / Halle McCrory4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMolly Mason / Tonya Shelton vs Leia Hartley / Abigail Lovelace6-1, 6-0
2025-10-30vs Claiborne 4.0 18Lost 12
L#1 DoublesClaire Mitchell / Stephanie James vs Peggy Claiborne / Sharon Garrison3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMelody Smith vs Krystal Garrison6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Mason / Brilee Barksdale vs Lauren Cantrell / Jana Killen1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-19vs Claiborne 4.0 18Won 40
W#1 DoublesClaire Mitchell / Stephanie James vs Peggy Claiborne / Shannon Clemmons7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMelody Smith vs Halle McCrory6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Fennel / Diana McCutcheon vs Holly Moody / Sabrina Eddins7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDonna Barksdale / Brilee Barksdale vs Abigail Lovelace / Leia Hartley6-1, 6-1
2025-10-13vs Claiborne 4.0 18Won 21
L#1 DoublesDonna Barksdale / Devon Hester vs Lauren Cantrell / Jana Killen1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Barker vs Tamela Traglia6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTonya Shelton / Diana McCutcheon vs Holly Moody / Kalyn Robbins7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Caitlin Barker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.66
Melody Smith
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.55
Brilee Barksdale
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Cynthia Fennel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Devon Hester
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Donna Barksdale
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Stephanie James
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Diana McCutcheon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.17
Tonya Shelton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Sandra Kirk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Hallie Mauldin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Barksdale + Devon Hester16560% games+12.5% vs expected
Diana McCutcheon + Cynthia Fennel6254% games+9.6% vs expected
Diana McCutcheon + Tonya Shelton5363% games+8.8% vs expected
Diana McCutcheon + Sandra Kirk224 matchesnot enough data
Donna Barksdale + Brilee Barksdale314 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie James + Cynthia Fennel314 matchesnot enough data
Tonya Shelton + Sandra Kirk303 matchesnot enough data
Tonya Shelton + Cynthia Fennel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caitlin Barker
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Melody Smith
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Brilee Barksdale
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Cynthia Fennel
52W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Devon Hester
29W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Donna Barksdale
43W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Stephanie James
25W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.36
4
Diana McCutcheon
30W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.34
Tonya Shelton
31W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Sandra Kirk
9W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
Hallie Mauldin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.