Teams

Su.Braga18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-05vs Ba.Wilhelm18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesMegan Slocum / Suzanne Braga vs Rossana Prevost / Alise Fredrickson3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-10-01vs Pa.Spell18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesCassy Albertson / Sarah Copley vs Melissa Green / MacKenzie Green6-3, 6-2
2023-09-24vs Ai.Mikula18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesCassy Albertson / Paige Alford vs Michele Lagerstedt / Casey Novak6-0, 7-5
2023-09-17vs Je.Komes18C5.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Sarah Copley vs Caroline Moore / Gigi Martin2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaige Alford / Cassy Albertson vs Emily Spencer / Dongbo Lu3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJaime Clark / Megan Slocum vs Alice Touchette / Sarah Taliaferro7-5, 6-2
2023-08-27vs Kr.Gilreath18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaige Alford / Cassy Albertson vs Patty Parrnelli / Mary Lewis James5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Slocum / Kathryn White vs Kristi Gilreath / Michelle Mills2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-08-20vs De.Farmer18C5.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Kathryn White vs Kelsey Barrasso / Dr Amy Linder2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Copley / Megan Slocum vs Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan / Kristen Gillispie7-6, 6-2
2023-08-13vs Ju.Andrews18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaige Alford / Kathryn White vs Jennifer Badham / Caroline Boykin5-7, 3-6
2023-08-06vs Li.Hammond18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Nikki Hastings vs Nadine Rubin / Kim Manning6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Jaime Clark
published 3.5
3.13
Paige Alford
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.72
Kathryn White
published
2.71
Megan Slocum
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Suzanne Braga
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Cassy Albertson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Sarah Copley
published
2.40
Jill Orr
published
Nikki Hastings
published
Shelley Truman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Braga + Megan Slocum3252% games+1.3% vs expected
Paige Alford + Cassy Albertson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jaime Clark
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Paige Alford
121W–138L career · 9 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
Kathryn White
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Megan Slocum
32W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Suzanne Braga
36W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Cassy Albertson
40W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Sarah Copley
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
Jill Orr
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%79%21%
2.40
Nikki Hastings
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shelley Truman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.