Teams

GSTL55/Collins/Dunes

2026 Adult 55 & Over - GSTL · Adult Men 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-09vs GSTL55/Johnson/WachesawLost 12
L#1 DoublesE Lawrence Langdale / Douglas Warstler vs James Johnson / Gary Wilson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTom Collins / Doug Hyatt vs GREG WAYBRIGHT / Andrew West1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCharles Jordan / Jay Bonnoitt vs John LaRochelle / John Martin5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-03-11vs GSTL55/Sappenfield/Grande DunesLost 12
W#1 DoublesTom Collins / Robert Farrar vs James Full / Brad Rittersporn1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesE Lawrence Langdale / Doug Hyatt vs Richard Babyak / Terry Walden3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCharles Jordan / Jay Bonnoitt vs ROB SAPPENFIELD / JAMES HULLIHEN3-6, 1-6
2026-02-18vs GSTL55/Sappenfield/Grande DunesLost 12
W#1 DoublesTom Collins / Robert Farrar vs Roberto Ferraro / Mark Forman6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesE Lawrence Langdale / Richard Young vs ROB SAPPENFIELD / JAMES HULLIHEN2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCharles Jordan / Jay Bonnoitt vs Terry Walden / Richard Babyak4-6, 2-6
2026-02-11vs GSTL55/Johnson/WachesawLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Farrar / Doug Hyatt vs James Johnson / Andrew West6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Jordan / Jay Bonnoitt vs GREG WAYBRIGHT / David Adamson6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Robert Farrar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
E Lawrence Langdale
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Doug Hyatt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Douglas Warstler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Charles Jordan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
John Charles Sandoz
published
2.86
Jay Bonnoitt
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Jordan + Jay Bonnoitt134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Farrar
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
E Lawrence Langdale
5W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Doug Hyatt
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
3.12
Douglas Warstler
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
Charles Jordan
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
John Charles Sandoz
8W–8L career · no lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.87
Jay Bonnoitt
9W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.