Teams

Wilson - RS Hard

2024 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-17vs Essex - SHLLost 01
L#2 DoublesSavannah Wilson / Melanie Bell vs Laura Savoie / Dana Persons3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-12-11vs Wilks - RS HardWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoyce Cook / Savannah Wilson vs Wendi Best / Thuy Nguyen6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTanya Hughes / Lauren Hughes vs Lauren Bowden / Kristen Sitton6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Wallace / Kacee Bidnick vs Stacy Wilks / Jennifer Capozzoli4-6, 0-6
2024-12-08vs Essex - SHLLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelanie Bell / Savannah Wilson vs Liz Edlund / Shari Essex6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2024-11-20vs Koontz - PACWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelanie Bell / Jennifer Johnson vs Jennifer McCurdy / Jenya Burkett6-4, 6-1
2024-11-05vs Ross - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesSkylar Wilson / Melanie Bell vs Kadi Taylor / Jill Olinick6-2, 6-4
2024-10-22vs Schweigert - PCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelanie Bell / Jennifer Johnson vs April Schweigert / Valerie Wilson2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Karen Penn
published
3.29
Melanie Bell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.26
Jacqueline Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Jeannette Fabbro
published
2.88
Jill Wilson
published
2.80
Lauren Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Kacee Bidnick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alita Fisher
published 3
Joyce Cook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Patterson
published
Savannah Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tanya Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Penn
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
Melanie Bell
39W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Jacqueline Wallace
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
Jeannette Fabbro
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.15
Jill Wilson
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
Lauren Hughes
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
Kacee Bidnick
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
2%95%3%
2.75
3
Alita Fisher
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joyce Cook
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Patterson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Savannah Wilson
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Tanya Hughes
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.