Teams

Hitmen 55+

2021 Neb. Adult 55&Over · 8.0 Adult Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-29vs WillmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Northey / Paul Barnes vs Paul Ronhovde / Michael Willman6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesScott Porath / Doug Tegler vs Mark Leahy / Chris Westergaard6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCurtis Goebel / Thomas Milburn vs Gordon Hinrichs / Jim Hain7-5, 6-1
2021-06-22vs WinquestLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Northey / Scott Porath vs Steven Barchus / Clark Thompson6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCurtis Goebel / Roderick Harley vs H Damon Osborne / Stephen Collins0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDoug Tegler / Thomas Milburn vs Joel Knudson / Jonathan Kendall6-7, 2-6
2021-06-15vs NE/Thomas/55&over8.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Barnes / Roderick Harley vs Kevin Shoemaker / J Michael Seaton1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Pass / David Stoupa vs Stephen Thomas / Steve Baker4-6, 3-6
2021-06-08vs WillmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Porath / Roderick Harley vs Paul Ronhovde / Brian Beene3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Milburn / Ed Boehle vs Mark Leahy / Roland Augspurger3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Pass / Doug Tegler vs Gordon Hinrichs / Jim Hain1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-01vs WinquestWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Barnes / Thomas Milburn vs Steven Barchus / Clark Thompson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Stoupa / Roderick Harley vs H Damon Osborne / Stephen Collins6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDoug Tegler / Ed Boehle vs Thomas Christensen / Joel Knudson1-6, 1-6
2021-05-25vs NE/Thomas/55&over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesCurtis Goebel / Roderick Harley vs Stephen Thomas / Steve Baker3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRobert Pass / Doug Tegler vs Tyrone Beasley / Ricardo Hernandez6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesThomas Milburn / Kim Martini vs J Michael Seaton / Joseph Lopez-Wilson4-6, 0-6
2021-05-18vs WillmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Porath / Robert Pass vs Mark Leahy / Matthew Westfall3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEd Boehle / Roderick Harley vs Paul Ronhovde / Michael Willman1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDoug Tegler / Kim Martini vs Gordon Hinrichs / Jim Hain2-6, 0-6
2021-05-11vs WinquestWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Barnes / Scott Porath vs Joel Knudson / Clark Thompson6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Stoupa / Thomas Milburn vs Steve Taylor / Jonathan Kendall6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Pass / Doug Tegler vs Greg Allen / Ronn Winquest6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-04vs NE/Thomas/55&over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Barnes / Robert Pass vs J Michael Seaton / Kevin Shoemaker4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Milburn / Kim Martini vs Stephen Thomas / Steve Baker2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesScott Porath / Doug Tegler vs Joseph Lopez-Wilson / Mike Gardner3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Adult Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/Thomas/55&over8.0M8122514172
2Willman45121535258
3Winquest36111634250
4Hitmen 55+3691839277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Paul Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Curtis Goebel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Doug Tegler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
David Stoupa
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.58
Scott Porath
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.52
David Northey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.11
Ed Boehle
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kim Martini
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Milburn
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Porath + David Stoupa111050% games+1.5% vs expected
Thomas Milburn + Scott Porath3348% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Milburn + David Stoupa1534% gamesnot enough data
Doug Tegler + Scott Porath2345% gamesnot enough data
Kim Martini + Thomas Milburn044 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Milburn + Doug Tegler033 matchesnot enough data
Scott Porath + Paul Barnes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Barnes
51W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Curtis Goebel
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Doug Tegler
40W–75L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
David Stoupa
44W–43L career · 7 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.71
Scott Porath
56W–100L career · 6 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
David Northey
14W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Ed Boehle
52W–60L career · 8 lines in 2021
19%80%<1%
3.11
Kim Martini
7W–20L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Thomas Milburn
30W–61L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.