Teams

YACTA - Anderson

2024 USTA 18 & Over League · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-13vs RCW - HimesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHeather Then / Laura Socks vs Heather Birk / Alexis Witgenstein4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Swimley / Barbetta Moffatt vs Deborah Deardorff / Tracy Weirich6-1, 6-0
2024-06-18vs Hershey Cocoa Power - WernerLost 12
L#1 DoublesPenelope Spalding / Laura Socks vs Laurie Sindlinger / Katie Blum7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBarbetta Moffatt vs Erica Jolly6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJulie Swimley / Mary Reigart vs Cyndi van Zandt / Sharon Downey5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-15vs RCW - MliczekWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Socks / Heather Then vs Monika Mliczek / Leslie Weller6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBarbetta Moffatt / Julie Swimley vs Tiffany Faranik / Gretchen Landis7-6, 7-6
2024-06-06vs Hempfield - Golden Tickets (Culp)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Socks / Heather Then vs Erica Cavanaugh / Debra Myers4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBarbetta Moffatt vs Dori Keller0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGail Anderson / Penelope Spalding vs Jackie Winter / Jeanne Sikora3-6, 1-6
2024-05-28vs Lancaster CC - JemisonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGail Anderson / Julie Swimley vs Stacey Brubaker / Christina Jemison4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPenelope Spalding / Laura Socks vs Kerrie Snavely / Renae Horan6-0, 6-1
2024-05-21vs Wisehaven - Hits and Gigs (Funk)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Socks / Penelope Spalding vs Natania Axe Brown / Polina Bolotnikova6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesLaura Socks / Heather Then vs Nicole Chiota-McCollum / Giusy Milazzo Leanza6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBarbetta Moffatt vs Madison South6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Swimley / Gail Anderson vs Linda Ray / Maureen Leader6-3, 6-1
2024-05-07vs CCY - BrozoskieSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPenelope Spalding / Heather Then vs Rana Ballan / Melissa Tony6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMary Reigart / Barbetta Moffatt vs Gretchen Chronister / Jennifer Hayes6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wisehaven - Hits and Gigs (Funk)0521328174
2Lancaster CC - Jemison07111020172
3RCW - Himes07101124193
4Bent Creek's Charming Challengers (Pasic)0781330224
5Hempfield - Golden Tickets (Culp)0817719175
6CCY - Brozoskie0815920170
7YACTA - Anderson08131122175
8RCW - Mliczek08121224210
9Hershey Cocoa Power - Werner08111330226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.42
Barbetta Moffatt
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.35
Heather Then
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Laura Socks
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.25
Gail Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.15
Julie Swimley
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 8% · published
2.14
Penelope Spalding
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.11
Mary Reigart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Ebner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Penelope Spalding + Laura Socks4350% games+11.2% vs expected
Gail Anderson + Julie Swimley4546% games+5.3% vs expected
Julie Swimley + Mary Reigart3248% games+3.2% vs expected
Laura Socks + Heather Then2355% games−0.3% vs expected
Gail Anderson + Penelope Spalding1440% games−1.4% vs expected
Julie Swimley + Penelope Spalding0824% games−11.6% vs expected
Karen Ebner + Julie Swimley0626% gamesnot enough data
Penelope Spalding + Barbetta Moffatt044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Barbetta Moffatt
30W–32L career · 9 lines in 2024
0%72%28%
2.42
Heather Then
15W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%86%14%
2.35
Laura Socks
9W–15L career · 7 lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.34
Gail Anderson
16W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.25
Julie Swimley
18W–57L career · 12 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.15
2.5
Penelope Spalding
14W–56L career · 9 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Mary Reigart
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Karen Ebner
2W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.