Teams

COLLIER/ McWaters/Adult18&over3.5M

2025 Collier Adult 18 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-21vs GreyHawk - PowellWon 10
W#2 DoublesGrant Gutwein / Jordan Rieks vs Randy Powell / Philip Hussey6-4, 6-2
2025-05-14vs Cambier / PackoWon 10
W#3 DoublesJordan Rieks / Francisco Suarez vs Tyler Canady / Colin Estrem6-1, 6-1
2025-05-07vs Riverstone /SteinWon 10
W#3 DoublesGrant Gutwein / Jordan Rieks vs Jim Halpin / Daniel Mendoza6-2, 6-3
2025-04-30vs GreyHawk - PowellWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Folger / Jordan Rieks vs Philip Hussey / John Schommer6-3, 6-3
2025-04-16vs Riverstone /SteinLost 23
L#1 DoublesBen Yocom / Grant Gutwein vs Ryan Wells / Charles Mccarthy5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPedro Gomez vs Scott Monette4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarkis Etoian / Miguel Pinto vs Jim Halpin / Gerard Benner7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesStanislav Savov vs Joshua Buckman6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTim Gordon / Robert Folger vs Sean Harrigan / Daniel Mendoza0-6, 3-6
2025-04-09vs GreyHawk - PowellLost 01
L#3 DoublesDon McWaters / John Acosta vs Jason Welsh / Brady Nehf3-6, 0-6
2025-03-26vs Riverstone /SteinWon 32
L#1 DoublesGrant Gutwein / Francisco Suarez vs Ryan Wells / Charles Mccarthy4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPedro Gomez vs Scott Monette6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSarkis Etoian / Ben Yocom vs Benjamin Stevens / Daniel Mendoza3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesStanislav Savov vs Joshua Buckman6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMiguel Pinto / Tim Gordon vs Sean Harrigan / Brian Chomniak7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Pedro Gomez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.60
Sarkis Etoian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Grant Gutwein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Stanislav Savov
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.56
Jordan Rieks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Robert Folger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Shep Burr
published
3.44
Ben Yocom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Tim Gordon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Andy Mintz
published 3.5
3.39
Gregory Beard
published
3.39
John Acosta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Francisco Suarez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Al Hazard
published 3.5
2.91
Don McWaters
published
Miguel Pinto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Rieks + Shep Burr7172% games+15.3% vs expected
Shep Burr + Gregory Beard5165% games+8.9% vs expected
Sarkis Etoian + Grant Gutwein12166% games+0.5% vs expected
Tim Gordon + Gregory Beard5551% games−1.1% vs expected
John Acosta + Jordan Rieks3353% gamesnot enough data
Robert Folger + Grant Gutwein314 matchesnot enough data
Tim Gordon + Grant Gutwein404 matchesnot enough data
Francisco Suarez + Gregory Beard303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pedro Gomez
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Sarkis Etoian
28W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Grant Gutwein
25W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Stanislav Savov
16W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Jordan Rieks
59W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.56
Robert Folger
34W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Shep Burr
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Ben Yocom
33W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Tim Gordon
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
Andy Mintz
27W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Gregory Beard
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
John Acosta
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Francisco Suarez
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Al Hazard
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Don McWaters
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
Miguel Pinto
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.