Teams

Sets and the City

Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women - DelChes-Tues

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-24vs BCRC Bad AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesDevona Glidewell / Emily Choromanski vs Kaitlin Strizki / Jenn Utterback4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRebecca Haber vs Tracy Colletti2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaVern Brown / Rachel Bello vs Kate Wilson / Chialing Sarva7-5, 1-0
2025-06-17vs Bucks LobstersLost 12
W#1 DoublesNina Liou / Melissa Nannen vs Robin Stamate / Lynn Ferrara6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMarissa Pina-bhatia vs Angela Park5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaVern Brown / Rachel Bello vs Colleen Check / Laureen Gallagher4-6, 3-6
2025-06-10vs Frog Hollow's Net GainsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Nannen / Nina Liou vs Cassie Lucas / Joy Minnick4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEleni Miltsakaki vs Sari Fisher6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRachel Bello / Rebecca Haber vs Rachel Carmody / Kim Neumann6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-03vs BCRC Bad AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesNina Liou / Melissa Nannen vs Tracy Colletti / Kaitlin Strizki6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMarissa Pina-bhatia vs Christine Mills1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJenna Zalut / Rachel Bello vs Alyssa Frysinger / Maryann Doyle6-3, 6-3
2025-05-20vs Bucks LobstersLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenna Zalut / Rebecca Haber vs Bridget Mulcahy / Lynn Ferrara3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesEleni Miltsakaki vs Colleen Check6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDevona Glidewell / Emily Choromanski vs Tracey Osecki / Erin Rizk6-1, 6-1
2025-05-13vs Frog Hollow's Net GainsLost 03
L#1 DoublesDevona Glidewell / Emily Choromanski vs Cassie Lucas / Joy Minnick1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMarissa Pina-bhatia vs Carrie Mehl1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaVern Brown / Rebecca Haber vs Heather Maertzig / Traci Forbes2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-06vs BCRC Bad AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesNina Liou / Melissa Nannen vs Christina Stewart / Jenn Utterback6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMarissa Pina-bhatia vs Christine Mills1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDevona Glidewell / Rebecca Haber vs Maryann Doyle / Alyssa Frysinger7-6, 5-4
2025-04-29vs Bucks LobstersLost 03
L#1 DoublesRebecca Haber / Jenna Zalut vs Lynn Ferrara / Bridget Mulcahy1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesEleni Miltsakaki vs Angela Park4-6, 3-4
L#2 DoublesEmily Choromanski / Devona Glidewell vs Erin Rizk / Melissa Hoffman2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-04-22vs Frog Hollow's Net GainsLost 12
L#1 DoublesNina Liou / Melissa Nannen vs Joy Minnick / Cassie Lucas3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesEleni Miltsakaki vs Sari Fisher6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDevona Glidewell / Marissa Pina-bhatia vs Deena Hopkins / Dorothy Duffy1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · 2.5 Women - DelChes-Tues
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Match Makers059613100
2HPTA057818131
3Stingers0681024164
4St Albans Wise Aces0716513129
5Get a Grip- Whitford0781328214
6Dub C Deuces0820411145
7No Strings Attached- Whitford08111328214
8Net Profits08101431210
9Luv Luv Kiss Kiss0891533236
10Frog Hollow's Net Gains0918922210
11That's What She Set09131432240
12Cynwyd Rising Racquets09111634236
13Sets and the City09101735242
14BCRC Bad Aces09101735254
15The Racquettes09101738274
16Drop Shots010171333269
17Waynesborough010121840302

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Nina Liou
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.37
Lauren Beckham
published
2.33
Melissa Nannen
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Devona Glidewell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Eleni Miltsakaki
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Emily Choromanski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.13
LaVern Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Marissa Pina-bhatia
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
1.99
Jenna Zalut
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.93
Rebecca Haber
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rachel Bello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Nannen + Nina Liou5351% games+0.9% vs expected
Devona Glidewell + Emily Choromanski134 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Nannen + Rebecca Haber224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nina Liou
50W–26L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Lauren Beckham
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.37
Melissa Nannen
10W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.33
2.5
Devona Glidewell
2W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Eleni Miltsakaki
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Emily Choromanski
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
LaVern Brown
6W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Marissa Pina-bhatia
1W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Jenna Zalut
5W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Rebecca Haber
3W–11L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Rachel Bello
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.