Teams

Cissell/JB/APCC

2026 Combo 18 & Over 5.5, 7.5, 9.5 · 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 9 5:30 PM
Three Oaks Racquet Club
Sep 15 6:00 PM
Allen Park Community Center
Sep 23 5:30 PM
Three Oaks Racquet Club
Oct 4 2:00 PM
Allen Park Community Center
Oct 14 7:30 PM
Three Oaks Racquet Club
2026-08-27vs Roberts/Sandusky/JB/3OaksWon 21
L#1 DoublesMorgan Davis-Daniel / Caitlin Sullins vs Jocelyn Johnson / Jenny Box5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHailey Knight / Gloria Faircloth vs Linda Smith / Brandy Johnston6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBeth McCartney / Rylee Sisco vs Tracy Roberts / Meredith Clark6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Shelley Cissell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Morgan Davis-Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Hailey Knight
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Kamri Herndon
published
2.76
Sarah Newbern
published
2.71
Rylee Sisco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Beth McCartney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.50
Gloria Faircloth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Renee Cobern
published
2.33
Aspyn Satterwhite
published 2.5
2.19
Caitlin Sullins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth McCartney + Caitlin Sullins4446% games−4.2% vs expected
Kamri Herndon + Hailey Knight314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelley Cissell
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Morgan Davis-Daniel
20W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
Hailey Knight
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Kamri Herndon
15W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Sarah Newbern
6W–14L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
Rylee Sisco
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
2.5
Beth McCartney
22W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
0%24%76%
2.60
Gloria Faircloth
8W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
Renee Cobern
19W–38L career · no lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Aspyn Satterwhite
15W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Caitlin Sullins
14W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.