Teams

Feyes/Yung-Okamoto/Nashville

2026 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-26vs Davis/Neal/NashvilleWon 41
L#1 DoublesBarbara Hooper / Venessa Seivers vs Elizabeth Broome / Shelby Ruehling2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesPaula Mcgowan vs Jill Porter6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Csernovicz / Stephanie Feyes vs Erin Neal / Elizabeth Davis6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTrina Gilbert / Katie Feyes vs Marjorie George / Lauren Pollard6-1, 6-2
W#4 DoublesKaly Bush / Shannon Smith vs Joy Cox / JULIE GONTAREK6-3, 6-2
2026-04-12vs McDonald/NashvilleWon 41
L#1 DoublesVenessa Seivers / Katie Feyes vs Tydres Mestiri / Crystal Wray5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTammy Jirjis vs Saba Chishti6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Csernovicz / Stephanie Feyes vs Hollie Williams / Chantel Wujtow6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeather Laney / Beth Lawrence vs Sandra Elliott / Lynelle McDonald6-1, 7-5
W#4 DoublesShannon Smith / Kaly Bush vs Lisa Blalock / Susanna Vaughan6-2, 6-2
2026-03-22vs Blevins/Thomas/NashvilleWon 32
L#1 DoublesTrina Gilbert / Beth Lawrence vs Norah Buikstra / Michelle Hamman6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPaula Mcgowan vs Michelle Reyzer6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathleen Doulin / Heather Laney vs Shari Glickman / Traci Holton3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Feyes / Elizabeth Csernovicz vs Jennifer Knight / Brenda Eckhart6-2, 6-2
L#4 DoublesHeidi Nickel / Heather Wire vs Cari Blevins / Heather Brandon4-6, 3-6
2026-03-08vs Wallace/NashvilleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKatie Feyes / Kaly Bush vs Tamara Graham / Beth Werther6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Laney / Kathleen Doulin vs Dana Griscom / Monica McDougall3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVenessa Seivers / Barbara Hooper vs Lisa Wallace / Celia Turner5-7, 2-6
W#4 DoublesHeidi Nickel / Heather Wire vs Regina Nutter / Nita Hollis6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Stephanie Feyes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.93
Paula Mcgowan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.91
Glenda Jordan
published
3.83
Courtney Hess
published 4
3.83
Elizabeth Csernovicz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Tammy Jirjis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.82
Heather Laney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Kaly Bush
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Trina Gilbert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Katie Feyes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Beth Lawrence
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Kathleen Doulin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Venessa Seivers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Heather Wire
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Heidi Nickel
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Barbara Hooper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.28
Pat Yung-Okamoto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Feyes + Stephanie Feyes7067% games+13.1% vs expected
Elizabeth Csernovicz + Stephanie Feyes8075% games+4.4% vs expected
Heather Wire + Heidi Nickel5849% games−1.8% vs expected
Heather Laney + Kathleen Doulin6358% games−5.3% vs expected
Barbara Hooper + Kathleen Doulin2446% games−7.4% vs expected
Beth Lawrence + Trina Gilbert5552% games−10.5% vs expected
Katie Feyes + Kaly Bush033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Feyes
34W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.06
Paula Mcgowan
11W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Glenda Jordan
14W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Courtney Hess
7W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.83
Elizabeth Csernovicz
27W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Tammy Jirjis
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Heather Laney
22W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Kaly Bush
28W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Trina Gilbert
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Katie Feyes
24W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Beth Lawrence
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Kathleen Doulin
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Venessa Seivers
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Heather Wire
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Heidi Nickel
70W–63L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Barbara Hooper
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Pat Yung-Okamoto
13W–5L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.