Teams

HG Fifties But Who's Counting - E. Vickers

2021 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-21vs Valencia Lakes - P. MorseWon 20
W#1 DoublesTibbie Farnsworth / Karen Cachion vs Carole Haywood / Debra Lowe6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Coston / Carmen Heggen vs Sharon Lucas / Shirley Payne6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTibbie Farnsworth / Tina Sturdevant vs Tracey Tupler / Jody McNamee6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSharon Patterson / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Donna Doyle / Jody McNamee5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-10-10vs Valencia Lakes - P. MorseWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnn Coston / Karen Cleland vs Sharon Lucas / Alexis Davies7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Dasilva / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Beth Hart / Naomi Bailey6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTibbie Farnsworth / Karen Cachion vs Geri Burke / Jody McNamee6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnn Coston / Carmen Heggen vs Lisa Strickland / Denys Hubbard7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2021-09-19vs Valencia Lakes - P. MorseWon 30
W#1 DoublesTibbie Farnsworth / Karen Cleland vs Barbara Rusignuolo / Shirley Payne6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlecia Collins / Tina Sturdevant vs Linda Taylor / Marie Yaghoobian6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHannah Gabora / Tricia Cardoso vs Pam Morse / Alexis Davies6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Tibbie Farnsworth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Ann Coston
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Erin Vickers
published 3.5
2.92
2.86
Annmarie Iwanicki
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Sherry Peterson
published
2.76
Karen Cachion
published
2.72
Carol Guidera
published 3
2.71
Hannah Gabora
published 3
2.67
Theresa Mays
published
2.65
Tina Sturdevant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Tricia Cardoso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Carmen Heggen
published 3
2.52
Karen Cleland
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Cardoso + Annmarie Iwanicki241153% games+2.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Dasilva + Tibbie Farnsworth13552% games−1.5% vs expected
Karen Cleland + Theresa Mays1638% gamesnot enough data
Tricia Cardoso + Tina Sturdevant1537% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Dasilva + Tina Sturdevant2345% gamesnot enough data
Tibbie Farnsworth + Tina Sturdevant314 matchesnot enough data
Tina Sturdevant + Sherry Peterson123 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Gabora + Karen Cleland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tibbie Farnsworth
209W–139L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Ann Coston
119W–101L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Erin Vickers
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Elizabeth Dasilva
115W–108L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Annmarie Iwanicki
85W–59L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
2.86
Sherry Peterson
21W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
Karen Cachion
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Carol Guidera
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Hannah Gabora
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
Theresa Mays
6W–12L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Tina Sturdevant
184W–133L career · 2 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
Tricia Cardoso
76W–64L career · 1 line in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Carmen Heggen
5W–15L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
2.55
Karen Cleland
3W–14L career · no lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.