Teams

2-ROakley-Eno Combo

2022 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-10-05vs 3-AYoung-EV-Combo-6.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher DeFusco / Tom Luben vs Conner Garrison / Keith Buckel7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-03vs 6-RLong--EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesReggie Oakley / Tom Luben vs Richard Poole / David Bautz6-4, 6-2
2022-09-28vs 1-JMontague-CCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristopher DeFusco / Tom Luben vs Chuck Clark / Will Johnson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesReggie Oakley / Trevor Noon vs Travis Angle / Brent Fox4-6, 6-7
2022-09-19vs 7-AMacKelfresh-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesTom Luben / Howard Kashefsky vs Marvin Davis / Mohammad Alimohammadi3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesReggie Oakley / Steven Burger vs Carl Laird / Cody Hibbard0-6, 4-6
2022-09-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesReggie Oakley / Tom Luben vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-12vs 4-ZRowles-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoe Park / Reggie Oakley vs Tanner Dellinger / Duffy Guschel1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTom Luben / Steven Burger vs Dan Heiser / Zach Rowles2-6, 1-6
2022-08-29vs 3-AYoung-EV-Combo-6.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTrevor Noon / Reggie Oakley vs Sathyan Guru / Keith Buckel6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-08-24vs 1-JMontague-CCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesReggie Oakley / Steven Burger vs Richard Riedel / Robert Long3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-08-22vs 6-RLong--EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesReggie Oakley / Howard Kashefsky vs Matt Carter / David Bautz6-3, 6-3
2022-08-17vs 4-ZRowles-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesChristopher DeFusco / Tom Luben vs Zach Rowles / Owen Daly4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesReggie Oakley / Steven Burger vs Raul Louzao / Gene Brady2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-08-08vs 7-AMacKelfresh-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesTrevor Noon / Tom Luben vs Cody Hibbard / Marvin Davis2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Joe Park
published
2.86
Tom Luben
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 3
2.66
Reggie Oakley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.43
Steven Burger
published
Howard Kashefsky
published
Trevor Noon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reggie Oakley + Tom Luben3347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joe Park
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Tom Luben
87W–115L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Christopher DeFusco
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Reggie Oakley
56W–103L career · 9 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.66
Steven Burger
10W–27L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.43
Howard Kashefsky
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Trevor Noon
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.