Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Torres)(FB)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.58 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Cindy Blackman
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.32
Helga Sauza
usually #1 Singles 48%, also #2 Singles 32% · published 3.5
3.27
Gerla Gallardo
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 3.5
Denisse Gomez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Guadalupe Castillo
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published 3.5
3.01
Elizabeth Wakefield
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Patricia Dalbin
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published
Patricia Samonte
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Patricia Uribe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ramona Beard
usually #3 Doubles 72%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Rocio Molina
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published
Rossana Roacho
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Sarahi Najera
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #2 Singles 31% · published
Selena Solis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Sintra Sampath
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rossana Roacho + Selena Solis2846% games+9.1% vs expected
Guadalupe Castillo + Patricia Uribe10952% games+5.4% vs expected
Gerla Gallardo + Guadalupe Castillo12656% games+0.8% vs expected
Rossana Roacho + Patricia Dalbin33860% games−1.0% vs expected
Ramona Beard + Guadalupe Castillo5262% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Patricia Dalbin2446% gamesnot enough data
Guadalupe Castillo + Sarahi Najera2445% gamesnot enough data
Rocio Molina + Gerla Gallardo224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Blackman
45W–47L career · 15 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Helga Sauza
76W–39L career · 25 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Gerla Gallardo
96W–61L career · 22 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Denisse Gomez
4W–3L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Guadalupe Castillo
92W–65L career · 19 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Elizabeth Wakefield
34W–14L career · type A · 14 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01
Patricia Dalbin
95W–70L career · 27 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Samonte
28W–67L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Uribe
48W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ramona Beard
54W–59L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rocio Molina
78W–48L career · 38 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rossana Roacho
118W–114L career · 36 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarahi Najera
69W–38L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Selena Solis
96W–102L career · 21 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sintra Sampath
74W–34L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.