Teams

NEGTA/Mary Ann West

2025 · 26 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesMarquita Cummings / Sabrina Akintan vs Julie McCoy / Ali Thompson6-2, 5-7, 7-6
2025-10-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesSabrina Akintan / Marquita Cummings vs Pamela McBride / Barb Miller6-1, 7-5
2025-10-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarquita Cummings / Sabrina Akintan vs Julie McCoy / Claudia Kempen6-4, 6-2
2025-10-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesMarquita Cummings / Sabrina Akintan vs Susan OBrien / April Giometti6-2, 6-4
2025-09-26vs CCC-CollinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesSabrina Akintan / Marquita Cummings vs Pam McNeilly / Debbie Westray6-0, 6-2
2025-09-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarquita Cummings / Sabrina Akintan vs Amy Lane / Angie Sisk6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 26 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NEGTA/Mary Ann West7137310215
2Chestatee-Smith35162449368
3CCC-Collins0843673464

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Marquita Cummings
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #1 Singles 18% · published
3.04
Michelle Ashwood
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.01
Chris Dalrymple
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.01
Cheryl Stone
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.98
Diana Stout
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #4 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.98
Carmen Hermes
usually #4 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.96
Lori D'Adamio
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Sabrina Akintan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Sue Mayfield
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
2.92
Debbie Wiley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.92
Rhonda Beck
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
Tricia Sexton
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Mary Cialella-Smith
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #4 Doubles 43% · published
2.85
Stewart Mary Jo
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Michele Gregory
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Mary Ann West
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Rosemarie Long
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sabrina Akintan + Marquita Cummings8162% games+14.7% vs expected
Diana Stout + Debbie Wiley8063% games+10.1% vs expected
Chris Dalrymple + Tricia Sexton8065% games+7.1% vs expected
Lori D'Adamio + Cheryl Stone6063% games+6.7% vs expected
Michelle Ashwood + Lori D'Adamio8361% games+6.5% vs expected
Stewart Mary Jo + Michele Gregory5452% games+2.8% vs expected
Sue Mayfield + Mary Cialella-Smith6162% games+2.0% vs expected
Rhonda Beck + Diana Stout6160% games+1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marquita Cummings
64W–28L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.27
Michelle Ashwood
55W–47L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Chris Dalrymple
56W–49L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Cheryl Stone
34W–16L career · type A · 11 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Diana Stout
35W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Carmen Hermes
59W–55L career · type A · 16 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.98
Lori D'Adamio
59W–55L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Sabrina Akintan
20W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Sue Mayfield
17W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Debbie Wiley
23W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Rhonda Beck
20W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
Tricia Sexton
24W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Mary Cialella-Smith
21W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Stewart Mary Jo
38W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Michele Gregory
76W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Mary Ann West
14W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Rosemarie Long
13W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.