Teams

RID RUTTER/KELLER

2025 FW Ladies 18 Social Doubles Summer League · Friday morning 3.5 ladies

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-11vs SOAKS MERCERLost 03
L#1 DoublesShannon Mulroy / Ashleigh Griffin vs Cynthia Cordial / Kristy Knowles-Acker1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Durham Cavanaugh / Kathryn Garcia vs Jan McKean / Carol O'Hanlon2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Ross / Lindsey Childs vs Melissa Missy Brignac / Melanie Rhodes1-6, 5-7
2025-07-11vs RTC FRIZZELL/COOPERLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline Kirkpatrick / Lauren Rao vs Gina Tallent / Marilyn Trevathan4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday morning 3.5 ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Gina Guirola
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Amanda Tonroy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
3.14
Megan Sordini
published
3.13
Shannon Mulroy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Ashleigh Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Lindsey Childs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Kathryn Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Taryn Compton
published
2.97
Sarah Peterson
published
2.97
Caroline Kirkpatrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Donna Durham Cavanaugh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Lindsey Edwards
published
Cathie Leslie
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taryn Compton + Lindsey Childs6165% gamesnot enough data
Maria Isabel Pena-Keller + Ashleigh Griffin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gina Guirola
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Amanda Tonroy
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Maria Isabel Pena-Keller
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Megan Sordini
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.14
Shannon Mulroy
31W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Ashleigh Griffin
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Lindsey Childs
17W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Kathryn Garcia
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Taryn Compton
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Sarah Peterson
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Caroline Kirkpatrick
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Donna Durham Cavanaugh
4W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
Lindsey Edwards
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Cathie Leslie
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.