Teams

PLEASANTON 40AW4.0A-DT

2025 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-21vs OSAGE PK 40AW4.0A-DTLost 01
L#1 SinglesWendy Alvarado-Zheng vs Caroline MacKe1-6, 1-6
2025-01-30vs BAY CLUB PL 40AW4.0A-DTLost 01
L#2 DoublesWendy Alvarado-Zheng / Donna Vis vs Tiffany Tran-Carper / Jing Vasseghi1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesWendy Alvarado-Zheng / Nicole Cring vs Tracey Hull / Kelley Krock4-6, 3-6
2025-01-07vs DIABLO CC 40AW4.0A-DTLost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Carey / Wendy Alvarado-Zheng vs Tracy Arnaudon / Carla Quinn1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Sharon Ressa
published
3.82
Mika Tsuchiiwa
published
3.73
Bowyee Gong
published 4
3.71
Debbie Soleta
published 4
3.70
Shawn Copenhagen
published
3.65
Wendy Alvarado-Zheng
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.57
Donna Vis
published
3.53
Kathleen Olla
published
3.46
Veronika Svecova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Nicole Cring
published
Sarah Carey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Vis + Sharon Ressa4162% gamesnot enough data
Bowyee Gong + Shawn Copenhagen224 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Soleta + Wendy Alvarado-Zheng224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Ressa
19W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Mika Tsuchiiwa
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.82
4
Bowyee Gong
41W–25L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Debbie Soleta
12W–15L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Shawn Copenhagen
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Wendy Alvarado-Zheng
109W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.65
Donna Vis
21W–14L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Kathleen Olla
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Veronika Svecova
17W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Nicole Cring
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.35
Sarah Carey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.