Teams

McMahon - Sandbaggers Society

2026 Hampton Roads Tri-Level · Hampton Roads Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 8 6:30 PM
Kempsville High School
Sep 11 6:30 PM
vs
Kempsville High School
Sep 15 6:30 PM
Kempsville High School
Sep 22 6:30 PM
vs
Kempsville High School
2026-09-01vs High Frequency Shots_McClungWon 30
W#1 DoublesTyler Cruz / John Jacobson vs Todd Detweiler / Cheng Tung6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJustin Pierce / Steven Nohe vs Thomas Allen / Andre Rogers6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDanny Williams / Tommy VanDaniker vs Keith McGhee / Ajay Trivedi6-4, 6-4
2026-08-18vs Sweitzer - RacquetshipLost 12
W#1 DoublesKevin Kopf / Tyler Cruz vs James Bracey / Christian Basnight6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJustin Pierce / Josh Pierce vs Dillon Bradshaw / David Nekoumand6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Nohe / Vinny Sciortino vs Noah Dobrinsky / Matthew Dey5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-11vs High Frequency Shots_McClungWon 30
W#1 DoublesDanny Williams / Steven Nohe vs Brian McClung / Keith McGhee6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJustin Pierce / Vinny Sciortino vs Andre Rogers / Thomas Allen6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichael McMahon / Josh Pierce vs Cheng Tung / Emil Vyskocil6-3, 6-3
2026-08-10vs Sweitzer - RacquetshipLost 02
L#2 DoublesJustin Pierce / John Jacobson vs Brian Sweitzer / Dillon Bradshaw2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Nohe / Tommy VanDaniker vs Noah Dobrinsky / Matthew Dey3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Hampton Roads Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McMahon - Sandbaggers Society1030017
2Sweitzer - Racquetship000000
3High Frequency Shots_McClung0103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Kevin Kopf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Tyler Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Justin Pierce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Josh Pierce
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
John Jacobson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Steven Nohe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Vinny Sciortino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Tommy VanDaniker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Danny Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Kopf
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Tyler Cruz
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.03
Justin Pierce
16W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.01
Josh Pierce
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
John Jacobson
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Steven Nohe
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.63
Vinny Sciortino
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.62
Tommy VanDaniker
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Danny Williams
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.