Teams

WI Adult 18&O 2.5W GML FLAC Teune

2026 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#2 DoublesDebra Klement-Thomas / Melanie Kulakowski vs Olga Huber / Katie Wolak5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-16Split 11
W#1 DoublesMelanie Kulakowski / Michelle Lemke vs Cindy Lanman / Mel Yaros7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Hirn / Julie Klein vs Jenny Graham / Melissa Wingate6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJulie Lois vs Mandi Maronn6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDebra Klement-Thomas / Jennifer Dempsey vs Kotoi Takahashi / Lindsey Roder2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Partyka / Carolyn Vescio vs Madelyn Mickiewicz / Kotoi Takahashi1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMelanie Coulter vs Lindsey Roder6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDebra Klement-Thomas / Jennifer Dempsey vs Olga Huber / Katie Wolak6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-25Won 21
W#1 DoublesKim Hirn / Lana Marjanovic vs Cindy Lanman / Mel Yaros6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJulie Lois vs Cristina Mason6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCarol Klement / Debra Klement-Thomas vs Jenny Graham / Melissa Wingate2-6, 6-7
2026-06-04Won 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Lois / Elisabeth Partyka vs Jana White / Jamie Peters6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Vescio / Julia Kennedy vs Cindy Lanman / Jenny Graham6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.55
Elisabeth Partyka
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.49
Julie Lois
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Carolyn Vescio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.93
Debra Klement-Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jonathan Teune
published
Julie Klein
published
Kim Hirn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Melanie Coulter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Melanie Kulakowski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Elisabeth Partyka
21W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
Julie Lois
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Carolyn Vescio
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Debra Klement-Thomas
4W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Jonathan Teune
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Klein
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kim Hirn
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melanie Coulter
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Melanie Kulakowski
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.