Teams

Sanchez - Los Dodgers

2025 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-09-17vs Cebulash - Who Is We? EvolutionLost 02
L#2 SinglesXavier Cha vs Jesse Cebulash2-6, 5-6
L#3 SinglesJarey Wang vs Taylor Murphy1-6, 6-6
2025-09-13vs Iancu - Single ShotsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJarey Wang vs Maury Baskin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs David Warren3-6, 1-6
2025-09-06vs Iancu - Single ShotsSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs Maury Baskin1-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesXavier Cha vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-27vs Liang - Just for FunWon 20
W#1 SinglesJarey Wang vs Chung-Kai Hsiao6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBryan Bassig vs Bo Liang6-0, 6-0
2025-08-22vs Takiar - Blazing Dodgers SinglesLost 01
L#1 SinglesBahaa Ghammraoui vs Keitaro Nishimura3-6, 6-7
2025-08-14vs Fung - RPMSplit 11
W#2 SinglesBryan Bassig vs Kameron Hnath6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs Louis Fung0-6, 5-7
2025-08-02vs Fung - RPMLost 02
L#1 SinglesJarey Wang vs Matthew Bent5-7, 4-6
L#3 SinglesBahaa Ghammraoui vs Jun Hee Kim5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-07-30vs Cebulash - Who Is We? EvolutionLost 01
L#1 SinglesXavier Cha vs Keming Wu4-6, 4-6
2025-07-22vs Liang - Just for FunWon 10
W#1 SinglesBahaa Ghammraoui vs Mark Tyler6-3, 6-1
2025-07-15vs Takiar - Blazing Dodgers SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesJarey Wang vs Keitaro Nishimura3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBryan Bassig vs Avahrom Siegel7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Bryan Bassig
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Jarey Wang
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.48
Xavier Cha
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Bahaa Ghammraoui
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Victor Sanchez
published
3.27
Myles Baldwin
published
3.22
Jon Anders
published
3.03
Adnan Karimi
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Anders + Victor Sanchez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bryan Bassig
143W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Jarey Wang
28W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Xavier Cha
121W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Bahaa Ghammraoui
57W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Victor Sanchez
32W–28L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Myles Baldwin
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Jon Anders
60W–44L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3
Adnan Karimi
119W–128L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.