Teams

PW.Fitzgerald

2025 CTRL Combo Doubles 55 & Over · Combo 55 & Over 7.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-07vs TING.ThioSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristine Peeples / Cindy Orlandini vs Jette Efsen / Gauri Johnson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Bendel / Julie Durand vs Shirley Kim / Lirong Zhao4-6, 0-6
2025-10-06vs LOCH.CinomanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Peeples / Cindy Orlandini vs Laura Weygandt / Jennifer Kuzma6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathryn Stone / Kim Ledlow vs Barbara Sinopoli / Debbie Powell6-4, 6-0
2025-09-22vs CAS.TrailWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Peeples / Cindy Orlandini vs Michelle Oury / Lynelle Boorey6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly Bendel / Kellie Francis vs Ann Locher / Donna Reiser6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRebecca Jacobsen / Ruthann Gray vs Lisa Griffin / Donna Wells6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-15vs TOC.ArneWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathryn Stone / Kim Ledlow vs Adrianne Leinbach / Amy Barclay6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRuthann Gray / Marylynn Fitzgerald vs Vicky Arne / Brenda Li1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDale Martin / Cindy Orlandini vs Amy Clarke / Patrice Dovel6-4, 6-3
2025-09-04vs PW.StutesmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Peeples / Jennifer Hensley vs Susan Fekete / Ellen Libby3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKelly Bendel / Janette Cunningham vs Kecia Serwin / Meg McDevitt0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarylynn Fitzgerald / Kellie Francis vs Cyndi Harvard Freeman / Harriet Wilson7-5, 6-4
2025-08-25vs LOCH.CinomanWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Peeples / Cindy Orlandini vs Nancy Cinoman / Brenda Steele6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Bendel / Dale Martin vs Laura Davidson / Jennifer Kuzma0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Hensley / Rebecca Jacobsen vs Barbara Sinopoli / Karen Zapko6-4, 6-1
2025-08-18vs MD.MetcalfWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Peeples / Kim Ledlow vs Dori Mcdarris / Claire Cesta7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-14vs CAS.TrailWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathryn Stone / Cindy Orlandini vs Ann Locher / Kimberly Hilt6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJanette Cunningham / Marylynn Fitzgerald vs Lisa Griffin / Donna Wells3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Bendel / Kim Ledlow vs Michelle Oury / Melyssa Kemp6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 55 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Kathryn Stone
published
3.61
Christine Peeples
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 10% · published 4
3.59
Kelly Bendel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.57
Cindy Orlandini
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.41
Julie Durand
published
3.40
Kellie Francis
published
3.39
Kim Ledlow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Ruthann Gray
published
3.34
Dale Martin
published 3.5
3.23
Jennifer Hensley
published
3.22
Janette Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.14
Rebecca Jacobsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Michelle Fitzgerald
published
3.02
Marylynn Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Leah Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Peeples + Cindy Orlandini6360% games+10.7% vs expected
Jennifer Hensley + Kim Ledlow3356% games+6.1% vs expected
Julie Durand + Cindy Orlandini9262% games+5.7% vs expected
Kim Ledlow + Cindy Orlandini8656% games+5.0% vs expected
Janette Cunningham + Cindy Orlandini17658% games−1.4% vs expected
Rebecca Jacobsen + Kim Ledlow10653% games−2.9% vs expected
Kellie Francis + Dale Martin3252% games−3.3% vs expected
Janette Cunningham + Michelle Fitzgerald2348% games−8.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Stone
36W–27L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Christine Peeples
200W–190L career · 10 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Kelly Bendel
89W–124L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Cindy Orlandini
136W–57L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
Julie Durand
18W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Kellie Francis
13W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Kim Ledlow
224W–158L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Ruthann Gray
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Dale Martin
24W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.34
Jennifer Hensley
17W–18L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Janette Cunningham
133W–159L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Rebecca Jacobsen
169W–183L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.14
Michelle Fitzgerald
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Marylynn Fitzgerald
71W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Leah Lee
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.