Teams

Wyoming/Hough/Mixed18&Over8.0C

2023 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · MIXED - 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-30vs Mixing it UpWon 20
W#1 DoublesTim Hough / Katherine Plowman vs John Fox / Kelly Matthews6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRob Pettigrew / TimAnn Day vs Diane McGee / Jeffrey Zenisek6-1, 6-3
2023-04-30vs Mixing it UpWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeff Cutts / Mandy Garman vs Linda Merigliano / Matt Fairbanks6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRob Pettigrew / TimAnn Day vs Kelly Matthews / Jeffrey Zenisek6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTim Hough / Mary Ridgeway vs Diane McGee / John Fox6-2, 6-1
2023-04-29vs Mixing it UpWon 30
W#1 DoublesTim Hough / Katherine Plowman vs Linda Merigliano / Daniel Plowman2-2
W#2 DoublesJeff Cutts / Mary Ridgeway vs Kelly Matthews / Matt Fairbanks6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRobert Litke / Mandy Garman vs Libby Erker / John Fox6-0, 6-1
2023-04-29vs Mixing it UpWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobert Litke / Kim Byrd vs Matt Fairbanks / Linda Merigliano4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeff Cutts / Mary Ridgeway vs Jeffrey Zenisek / Libby Erker6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRob Pettigrew / Mandy Garman vs Diane McGee / Daniel Plowman7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MIXED - 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wyoming/Hough/Mixed18&Over8.0C40111260
2Mixing it Up0411123145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
TimAnn Day
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Mary Ridgeway
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Katherine Plowman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jeff Cutts
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kim Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mandy Garman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rob Pettigrew
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Robert Litke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tim Hough
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
TimAnn Day
6W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Mary Ridgeway
26W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Katherine Plowman
35W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Jeff Cutts
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Byrd
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mandy Garman
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rob Pettigrew
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Litke
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Hough
9W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.