Teams

IND:CrippleThreat:Gerhard

2025 NH Adult 18 & Over Men's Singles Flex Summer · 3.5 Men 1

1 player · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-27vs EXE:HooperLost 01
L#1 SinglesAdam Gerhard vs Dave Hooper1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-08-14vs BOSS:StottWon 10
W#1 SinglesAdam Gerhard vs Jeffrey Stott6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EXE:Hooper5151448
2BOSS:Stott3434866
3GB:Sipahi2020117
4LNH:Tofts2222422
5MTS:Scharpf1111212
6IND:CrippleThreat:Gerhard1111323
7MTS:Scott0202427
8ALG:Weissberg0303637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Adam Gerhard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adam Gerhard
104W–114L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.