Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Penman/Brown

2023 Winter League-Saturday · 4.5M Saturday

18 players · average NTRP 4.50 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-25vs Wasatch Hills-ChengWon 21
W#1 DoublesJon Penman / Kris Rosander vs Patrick Sheehan / Don Pettigrew6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRiley Booker / Bruce Brandon vs Trinh Tran / Christian Camp6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrian Kasteler / Tim Sears vs Steve Albert / Austin Kirk6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2023-03-18vs Liberty Park Tennis-BublikLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Marsh / Andrew Marsh vs Glen Hogendoorn / John Collins6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRiley Booker / Ryan Peterson vs Howard Kadish / Camdin Nelson7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-03-11vs Sunpro-Fowkes/EllisLost 03
L#1 DoublesKris Rosander / Jon Penman vs Michael Margolies / Cole Paterson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKyle Kugler / Jason Nielsen vs Kaden Craig / Michael Lundberg3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Peterson / Riley Booker vs Ryan Bell / Barry Hancock3-6, 3-6
2023-03-04vs Sports Mall-AllredWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Marsh / James Marsh vs Jory Allred / Shawn Hancock6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKyle Kugler / Jason Nielsen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTim Sears / Jon Penman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-18vs Wasatch Hills-ChengLost 12
L#1 DoublesKris Rosander / Andrew Marsh vs Craig Zimmerman / Christian Camp7-6, 3-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBruce Brandon / Riley Booker vs Trinh Tran / Austin Kirk6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJason Nielsen / Jon Penman vs Michael Topp / Quinn Pritchett5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-02-11vs Liberty Park Tennis-BublikWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Marsh / James Marsh vs Long Le / Tony Lew4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJason Nielsen / Kyle Kugler vs Peter Bublik / Dylan Wilde6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrian Kasteler / Jon Penman vs Howard Kadish / Camdin Nelson6-3, 5-4
2023-02-04vs Sunpro-Fowkes/EllisLost 02
L#1 DoublesJon Penman / Bruce Brandon vs Eliott Moreno / Arthur Miyazaki3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKyle Kugler / Tim Sears vs Kaden Craig / Nathan Balls2-6, 2-6
2023-01-28vs Sports Mall-AllredLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Nielsen / Kyle Kugler vs Jory Allred / Shawn Hancock5-7, 2-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Andrew Marsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.45
Kris Rosander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Mitch Easton
published 4.5
4.24
Jonathan Brown
published
4.24
Dan Summerhays
published 4.5
4.23
Tim Sears
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.22
Jason Nielsen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.17
Ryan Scott
published
4.16
Kyle Kugler
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.16
Riley Booker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.10
Brian Kasteler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Jon Penman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Bruce Brandon
published
James Marsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Easton
published
Jeremy Harman
published
Lun Dai
published
Ryan Peterson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Marsh + James Marsh5161% games+4.1% vs expected
Kris Rosander + Mitch Easton9458% games+3.5% vs expected
Ryan Scott + Mitch Easton10554% games+3.2% vs expected
Kris Rosander + Jonathan Brown9356% games+2.3% vs expected
Kris Rosander + Jon Penman231155% games+1.4% vs expected
Brian Kasteler + Jonathan Brown7453% games−0.6% vs expected
Kyle Kugler + Jason Nielsen563855% games−0.7% vs expected
Jason Nielsen + Jon Penman4547% games−7.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Marsh
29W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
4.51
4.5
Kris Rosander
123W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
4.45
4.5
Mitch Easton
49W–25L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
4.33
Jonathan Brown
36W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Dan Summerhays
35W–17L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
4.24
Tim Sears
23W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Jason Nielsen
98W–61L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
4.22
Ryan Scott
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Kyle Kugler
74W–54L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
4.16
Riley Booker
40W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Brian Kasteler
77W–59L career · 2 lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
4.10
Jon Penman
64W–49L career · 6 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.99
Bruce Brandon
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
James Marsh
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeff Easton
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeremy Harman
17W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lun Dai
14W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryan Peterson
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.