Teams

8.0 is Enough

2024 Frederick Mixed 18 & Over · Frederick Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.71 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-02-24vs FredCoCha 8.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSamantha Gass / Kevin Gass vs Robert Kargus / Karen Coyne4-6, 1-6
2024-02-21vs GordonLost 01
L#2 DoublesKevin Gass / Karen Seyler vs Ivan Kozliak / Kristin Ostlie4-6, 6-7
2024-02-13vs GordonLost 01
L#2 DoublesKevin Gass / Samantha Gass vs Juan Jose Tijero / Holly Erdely6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2024-02-05vs GordonLost 02
L#1 DoublesSamantha Gass / Kevin Gass vs Pamela Dean / Derek Johnson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDennis Weikel / Christina Truax vs Amanda Frushour / Luis Lozano2-6, 0-6
2024-01-29vs FredCoCha 8.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Seyler / Brian Baumgardner vs Jean Lim / Sean Alewine4-6, 1-6
2024-01-22vs GordonLost 01
L#3 DoublesDennis Weikel / Elona Novitski vs Justin Cady / Erin Newsome Moltz3-6, 4-6
2024-01-14vs FredCoCha 8.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSamantha Gass / Kevin Gass vs Giselle Medina / Robert Kargus7-6, 4-6
2024-01-11vs FredCoCha 8.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSamantha Gass / Kevin Gass vs Jean Lim / Alexandre Fines2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Samantha Gass
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
3.59
James Mellendick
published
3.55
Dennis Weikel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Christina Truax
published 4
3.49
Kevin Gass
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
Stephanie Almeida
published
3.38
Karen Seyler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.36
Kerry Spicer
published
3.17
Richard Spicer
published
3.16
Phillip Harvin
published 3.5
Elona Novitski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha Gass + Kevin Gass61045% games+2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Samantha Gass
106W–61L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Christine Pagendarm
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
James Mellendick
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Dennis Weikel
147W–171L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.55
4
Christina Truax
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Kevin Gass
110W–65L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
Stephanie Almeida
3W–14L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.48
3.5
Karen Seyler
134W–121L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kerry Spicer
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.36
Richard Spicer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Phillip Harvin
144W–211L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Elona Novitski
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.