Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesKelly Bennett / Theresia Treadway vs Martha Ehrenfeld / Kendall Laidlaw7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShan Lu / Marilena Gallotta vs Amy Kleckner / Michelle Philpot3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Hudson / Rebecca Harlow vs Janet Arnesty / Lois Anne Indorf6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Erika LaMarch
published
3.92
Rachel Gabato
published
3.85
Anthea Pang
published 4
3.81
Sally Le
published
3.74
Lisa Laanisto
published
3.74
Jess Sterrett
published
3.69
Kelly Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Claudia Vlasak
published 4
3.53
3.45
Elizabeth Au
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Angela Lam
published 3.5
3.39
Marilena Gallotta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Shan Lu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Theresia Treadway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Rebecca Harlow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Su-Mien Chong
published
3.11
Jing Gu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paulina Gebska
published
Sandy Shepherd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Isabella Canlas + Kelly Bennett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erika LaMarch
50W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
4.10
Rachel Gabato
2W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Anthea Pang
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Sally Le
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Lisa Laanisto
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Jess Sterrett
17W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Kelly Bennett
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Claudia Vlasak
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Maria Isabella Canlas
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Elizabeth Au
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Angela Lam
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Marilena Gallotta
21W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Shan Lu
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.36
Theresia Treadway
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.31
Rebecca Harlow
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Su-Mien Chong
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Jing Gu
14W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Paulina Gebska
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Shepherd
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.