Teams

STC WELAYA

2026 FW USTA Adult Fall Ladies · Friday 2.5 ladies

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-31vs RC KELLYWon 30
W#1 DoublesKate Dayoub / Robin Groninga vs Ana Shiverick / Lucy Kelly4-5
W#1 SinglesKim Tanner vs Courtney Schmuck6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNatalia Peterson / Rhya Miller vs Teighlor Mays / Charlotte Knapp6-3, 6-3
2025-10-24vs RID EDWARDSWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Etheredge / Kim Tanner vs Margaret Brown / Rachel Payne4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKate Dayoub vs Danielle Dollahite3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindsey Dusek / Natalia Peterson vs Robin Edwards / Cailey Walton2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-17vs TCU WALKER/DE LA FUENTELost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Tanner / Kimberley Jagielko vs Sarah Carroll / Ashlee Gutierrez2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLindsey Dusek vs Tara Haraldson2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNatalia Peterson / Lauren Shouse vs Ayesha Akhtar de la Fuente / Heather Varon6-1, 6-2
2025-10-03vs RID KENNEDY/HARRWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Etheredge / Kimberley Jagielko vs Lauren Harr / Blair Boydstun6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLori Bailey / Isabela Joffe vs Laura Jo Klein / Kelsey Schuler6-2, 6-4
2025-09-26vs TCU THOMAS/SCHNEIDERLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaksmi Davaloor / Kate Dayoub vs Crystal Thomas / Allison Khan2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRobin Groninga vs Susan Cole1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLori Bailey / Isabela Joffe vs Miriah Schneider / crystal abuaitah1-6, 3-6
2025-09-19vs CCC BREDTHAUERWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberley Jagielko / Lauren Shouse vs Kelly Cumpiano / Madeline Gwyn6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLaksmi Davaloor vs Taylor Wallace6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLori Bailey / Rhya Miller vs Kaitlyn Zimmerman / Christal Miller0-6, 1-6
2025-09-12vs CCC MCDONALDLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaksmi Davaloor / Kate Dayoub vs Chelsea Allen / Katie Mcdonald6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesRhya Miller vs Ashley Hodges1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLori Bailey / Isabela Joffe vs Whitney Rudner / Elizabeth Warren3-6, 2-6
2025-09-05vs SO WHITMIRE/DAKANLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindsey Dusek / Natalia Peterson vs Lizzie Voigt / Lizzie Whitmire3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKimberley Jagielko vs Amanda Peterson3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRobin Groninga / Rama Welaya vs Heather Teems / Kelly Dakan6-3, 4-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · Friday 2.5 ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCC MCDONALD712049135
2BIR CONRAD7117714164
3TCU THOMAS/SCHNEIDER7117717158
4SO WHITMIRE/DAKAN53141022186
5MV HARPER/RILEY53131125202
6STC WELAYA44131125198
7CCC KNUCKLEY35101429209
8ALL DECK35101432231
9RC KELLY35101433236
10CCC BREDTHAUER2691533238
11TCU WALKER/DE LA FUENTE2691533219
12RID KENNEDY/HARR2671736246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.58
Kate Dayoub
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.45
Elizabeth Etheredge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.41
Laksmi Davaloor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.36
Lauren Shouse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.35
Kim Tanner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.33
Lindsey Dusek
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.29
Robin Groninga
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.28
Kimberley Jagielko
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.27
Natalia Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.17
Isabela Joffe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.12
Rama Welaya
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.11
Lori Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Rhya Miller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laksmi Davaloor + Kate Dayoub314 matchesnot enough data
Natalia Peterson + Lindsey Dusek213 matchesnot enough data
Lori Bailey + Isabela Joffe123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Dayoub
10W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
2.5
Elizabeth Etheredge
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.45
Laksmi Davaloor
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.41
Lauren Shouse
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
Kim Tanner
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.35
Lindsey Dusek
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.33
Robin Groninga
8W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
Kimberley Jagielko
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28
Natalia Peterson
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Isabela Joffe
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Rama Welaya
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Lori Bailey
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Rhya Miller
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.