Teams

WTiedeman (OPRC)

2026 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Combo 8.5 Men - Wed PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-19vs JNichols (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMario Gonzalez / Stephen Kennen vs David Strause / Rod Spence4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJay Tiedeman / Bo Chriscoe vs Daniel Comisar / James Nichols4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWade Farrow / Sean Hickey vs Bryan Skelton / Eric Tan3-6, 2-6
2026-08-05vs ZStroupe (Myers Park)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSean Hickey / Rod Hartley vs Zachary Stroupe / Steve Brinkman2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDuncan Thompson / Hunt Allen vs Dick Parkhurst / Darryl Thompson4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJay Tiedeman / Wally Dawson vs William Merlo / Emmet Dyer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 55 & Over Combo 8.5 Men - Wed PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1JNichols (Queens)3081362
2SSwanson (Palisades)2060128
3ZStroupe (Myers Park)12361397
4WTiedeman (OPRC)02151170
5BBrupbacher (WSRC)02061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Jay Tiedeman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.05
Rod Hartley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Bo Chriscoe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Wade Farrow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Sean Hickey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
John England
published
3.68
Duncan Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Wally Dawson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Hunt Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Nee
published
Mario Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephen Kennen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jay Tiedeman
48W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Rod Hartley
71W–66L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
4.05
4
Bo Chriscoe
64W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Wade Farrow
23W–26L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
Sean Hickey
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
John England
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Duncan Thompson
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Wally Dawson
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Hunt Allen
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jon Nee
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mario Gonzalez
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Kennen
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.