Teams

GJTC VKENNEDY

2026 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - WS · WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME - WS

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-16vs GJTC SDIXWon 21
L#1 DoublesErin Zalinski / Megan Barnhurst vs Heidi Paul / Emily Richardson6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Mill / Jaymie Redfern vs Karen Baskin / Julie Nemiroff6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVal Kennedy / Jeena Jolley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-09vs GJTC SDIXWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeena Jolley / Megan Barnhurst vs Heidi Paul / Stacie Dix6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesErin Zalinski / Leia Hillan vs Keely Eberly / Emily Richardson2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSusan Erb / Jaymie Redfern vs Monica Hudson / Laurie Rink6-4, 6-1
2026-06-02vs GJTC SDIXWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeena Jolley / Susan Erb vs Stacie Dix / Gisela Ferguson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVal Kennedy / Dana Lee Dunn vs Monica Hudson / Julie Nemiroff6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCynthia Mill / Tessa Taylor vs Laurie Rink / Karen Baskin6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-26vs GJTC SDIXWon 21
W#1 DoublesVal Kennedy / Dana Lee Dunn vs Monica Hudson / Julie Nemiroff6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCynthia Mill / Jaymie Redfern vs Laurie Rink / Heidi Paul1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErin Zalinski / Tessa Taylor vs Karen Baskin / Emily Richardson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-19vs GJTC SDIXWon 30
W#1 DoublesVal Kennedy / Dana Lee Dunn vs Heidi Paul / Theresa Heer2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeena Jolley / Dana Prosser vs Keely Eberly / Karen Baskin6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesErin Zalinski / Leia Hillan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-12vs GJTC SDIXWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeena Jolley / Erin Zalinski vs Keely Eberly / Theresa Heer7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLeia Hillan / Tessa Taylor vs Heidi Paul / Laurie Rink3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesVal Kennedy / Cynthia Mill vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-05vs GJTC SDIXLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeia Hillan / Jaymie Redfern vs Theresa Heer / Karen Baskin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVal Kennedy / Jeena Jolley vs Holly Smith / Julie Nemiroff6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMegan Barnhurst / Tessa Taylor vs Monica Hudson / Emily Richardson4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME - WS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GJTC VKENNEDY6114717140
2GJTC SDIX1671432212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Jeena Jolley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.58
Dana Lee Dunn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Dana Prosser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Val Kennedy
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Cynthia Mill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Megan Barnhurst
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Jaymie Redfern
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Susan Erb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Erin Zalinski
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.87
Leia Hillan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Tessa Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeena Jolley + Dana Lee Dunn19069% games+12.6% vs expected
Megan Barnhurst + Val Kennedy10753% games+5.3% vs expected
Dana Lee Dunn + Val Kennedy9263% games+3.7% vs expected
Jeena Jolley + Megan Barnhurst21858% games+3.2% vs expected
Jeena Jolley + Val Kennedy321160% games+2.4% vs expected
Cynthia Mill + Jaymie Redfern14757% games−6.3% vs expected
Leia Hillan + Val Kennedy5458% gamesnot enough data
Dana Lee Dunn + Megan Barnhurst213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jeena Jolley
145W–58L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.66
3.5
Dana Lee Dunn
46W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Dana Prosser
6W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Val Kennedy
143W–83L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Cynthia Mill
90W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Megan Barnhurst
83W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Jaymie Redfern
75W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Susan Erb
27W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Erin Zalinski
87W–105L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
3.09
3
Leia Hillan
46W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Tessa Taylor
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.