Teams

5-MParker-WW

2023 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day

10 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2023-05-07Won 20
W#2 DoublesButton Hall / Lisa Carley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDeb Lanier / Mary Parker vs Valerie Williams / Kathleen Finley6-1, 6-1
2023-05-05vs 10-EBrown-CHTCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / Mary Parker vs Marty Brooks / Ellen Brown6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDonna Newell / Angela Baxley vs Catherine Feole / Harriett Bobbitt4-6, 3-6
2023-04-23vs 13-NPike - HVCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusana Harvey / Tammy Bradley vs Ruth Caccavale / Gina Goldthwaite6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Parker / Deb Lanier vs Nancy Pike / Thekla Pappas6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-21Won 30
W#1 DoublesDeb Lanier / Laura Davidson vs Stacey Stamer / Stephanie Tindel6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Newell / Angela Baxley vs Tammy Sterling / Michelle Trinco6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Parker / Susana Harvey vs Marianne Keenan / Jane Mayberry6-0, 6-0
2023-04-04vs 2-Khoekstra-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesButton Hall / Angela Baxley vs Brynn Hale / Cynthia Sundy7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTammy Bradley / Susana Harvey vs Kateri Hoekstra / KAREN OTSEA6-3, 6-2
2023-04-01vs 4-VHiguchi-CHTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesButton Hall / Lisa Carley vs Beth Spinarski / Melissa Fitzpatrick2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-03-31vs 3-mlong55plus3.5-WWWon 21
W#1 DoublesTammy Bradley / Torey Wahlstrom vs Barbara Howe / Laura Riedel6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAngela Baxley / Donna Newell vs Donna Holtaway / Caroline Patzer5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusana Harvey / Mary Parker vs Beth Clark / Mary T Long6-2, 6-2
2023-03-24vs 1-DGolden-CHTCWon 20
W#2 DoublesAngela Baxley / Donna Newell vs Bailey Cook / Sarah Ederle7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMillie Hunter / Allison Stewart-Smull vs Dina Golden / Gail Calloway6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-03-22vs 6-MSnow-HSLost 12
L#1 DoublesTammy Bradley / Susana Harvey vs Mary Jo Dunnington / Jennifer Hoffmann2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAllison Stewart-Smull / Millie Hunter vs Donna Spero / Millicent Snow3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDonna Newell / Angela Baxley vs Sally Mauriello / Pat Rowe6-3, 6-1
2023-03-21vs 9-MFitzgerald-SBWon 20
W#1 DoublesButton Hall / Deb Lanier vs Adela McGeehin / Dale Martin6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / Tammy Bradley vs Janette Cunningham / Molly Grundner6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2023-03-17vs 7-JHagerty55-HVFYMCAWon 30
W#1 DoublesTammy Bradley / Torey Wahlstrom vs Gay Engelbrecht / Barbara St Clair6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / Deb Lanier vs Mary Duddy / Sharon Paye6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesButton Hall / Mary Parker vs Denise Heinze / DJ Maniace6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-02-24vs 11-KCuller-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngela Baxley / Button Hall vs Debbie Fuller / Karin Yoch6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / Deb Lanier vs Kim Craig / Karen Sindelar6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Susana Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.68
Torey Wahlstrom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Deb Lanier
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.58
Button Hall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.37
Tammy Bradley
published
3.32
Donna Newell
published
3.07
Lisa Carley
published
3.06
Angela Baxley
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.00
Millie Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deb Lanier + Button Hall9463% games+13.3% vs expected
Deb Lanier + Susana Harvey27668% games+2.9% vs expected
Angela Baxley + Button Hall404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susana Harvey
401W–157L career · type A · 9 lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.71
4
Torey Wahlstrom
97W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Deb Lanier
487W–223L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.59
4
Button Hall
223W–223L career · 6 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Tammy Bradley
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.37
Donna Newell
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Lisa Carley
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.07
3.5
Angela Baxley
290W–178L career · 7 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Millie Hunter
64W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Allison Stewart-Smull
1W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.