Teams

WOCC Moehling

2023 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weekday · Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Weekday

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Laura Granger
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.88
Darlene Moehling
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.79
Jennifer Smith
published
3.69
Natalie Dunton
published
3.46
Tia Thomas
published
3.38
Heather Drew
published 3.5
3.22
Jennifer Burris
published
3.22
Jenny Norfleet
published
3.21
Kelly Gregory
published
3.20
Ainsley Crowell
published 3.5
3.19
Elizabeth Garnett
published 3.5
3.10
Jenefer Williams
published
3.00
Sandy Pisano
published
2.94
2.74
Catherine Hunt
published 3
2.69
Emily Kennedy
published 3
2.53
Juliet Dagostino
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenefer Williams + Ainsley Crowell134 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Pisano + Elizabeth Garnett134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Laura Granger
131W–99L career · 7 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.92
4
Darlene Moehling
113W–77L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
Jennifer Smith
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
Natalie Dunton
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Tia Thomas
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Heather Drew
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
Jennifer Burris
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Jenny Norfleet
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
Kelly Gregory
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Ainsley Crowell
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Elizabeth Garnett
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
Jenefer Williams
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
Sandy Pisano
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Catherine Ianchulev
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Catherine Hunt
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Emily Kennedy
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Juliet Dagostino
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.