Teams

Payne Park Perhaes

2023 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekday · 3.5 W Thursday

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-06-01vs River Strand SherrWon 10
W#3 DoublesWendi Chapman / Christen Tooley vs Vikki Parker / Kelly Anderson6-1, 6-2
2023-05-25vs LBK Club SamuelsWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristen Tooley / Debbie Mays vs Nancy McLean / Cecy Siegler6-1, 6-0
2023-05-18vs University Park ReeveWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebbie Mays / Christen Tooley vs Claudia Clark / Ursula Ruckli6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWendi Chapman / Robin Sheridan vs Linda Heitzner / Barbara Komarin6-0, 6-2
2023-05-12vs LBK Public LevyWon 20
W#2 DoublesWendi Chapman / Robin Sheridan vs Kristy Owens / Cassandra McPike7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPamela Mousseau / Christen Tooley vs Diana Trivax Levy / Patti Kuisel6-3, 6-2
2023-05-11vs Payne Park AllertonWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobin Sheridan / Wendi Chapman vs Paula Brown / Ann Clifford-McGough6-4, 6-1
2023-05-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesPamela Mousseau / Christen Tooley vs Etta Carter / Lisa Johnson6-1, 6-1
2023-04-27vs Meadows KeyserWon 10
W#1 DoublesDebbie Mays / Christen Tooley vs Donna Spielberger / Amy Millspaugh7-6, 6-3
2023-04-20vs LWR Serving SlicesLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendi Chapman / Christen Tooley vs Nia Esposito / Martina Kralickova4-6, 6-7
2023-04-13vs SSC WindsorWon 10
W#2 DoublesWendi Chapman / Christen Tooley vs Elaine Lersch / Julie Pipes6-1, 6-2
2023-04-06vs LBK Public YoungerLost 01
L#2 DoublesWendi Chapman / Christen Tooley vs Christine Goodwin / Kelly French3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Christen Tooley
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Lynn Heinz
published
3.34
Bonita Fyala
published 3.5
3.33
Wendi Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.18
Robin Sheridan
published
Linda Mulcahy
published
Pamela Mousseau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christen Tooley + Wendi Chapman41147% games−7.5% vs expected
Bonita Fyala + Pamela Mousseau123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christen Tooley
60W–44L career · 9 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.52
Lynn Heinz
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Bonita Fyala
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Wendi Chapman
37W–32L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Robin Sheridan
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Linda Mulcahy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pamela Mousseau
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.