Teams

WI Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 NEL DePere HS Janssen

2024 WI Mixed 18 & Over · WI Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-25vs WI/Barash/18&Over8.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesZach Janssen / Grace Kowalkowski vs Adam Hawley / Annie Docter6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesParker Christianson / Kylie Coel vs Robert Downey / Patricia Lison-Sheikh1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJack Lemkuil / Paige Gorges vs Sue Roberts / Andy Taylor6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-08-25vs WI/Barash/18&Over8.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesZach Janssen / Paige Gorges vs Adam Hawley / Annie Docter3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJack Lemkuil / Grace Kowalkowski vs Robert Downey / Tara Sherman4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesParker Christianson / Kylie Coel vs Nathan Barash / Tara Cooper4-6, 6-7
2024-08-07vs WI/Barash/18&Over8.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesParker Christianson / Susan Lin vs Nathan Barash / Tara Cooper3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJack Lemkuil / Grace Kowalkowski vs Joshua Brown / Tara Sherman2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPaige Gorges / Evan Watzka vs Kaitlyn Jonen / Andy Taylor2-6, 0-6
2024-07-14vs WI/Barash/18&Over8.0XLost 12
W#1 DoublesZach Janssen / Paige Gorges vs Nathan Barash / Kaitlyn Jonen6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesParker Christianson / Susan Lin vs Joshua Brown / Patricia Lison-Sheikh2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKim Perna / Jack Lemkuil vs Sue Roberts / Andrew Flick1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WI Mixed 18 & Over 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI/Barash/18&Over8.0X40111375
2WI Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 NEL DePere HS Janssen0411122140

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jack Lemkuil
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.38
Parker Christianson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Grace Kowalkowski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Evan Watzka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Perna
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Kylie Coel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Paige Gorges
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Lin
published
Zach Janssen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jack Lemkuil
0W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Parker Christianson
12W–25L career · 6 lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.38
Grace Kowalkowski
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
Evan Watzka
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kim Perna
35W–38L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kylie Coel
14W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paige Gorges
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Lin
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Zach Janssen
23W–4L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.